Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-24-2013, 03:48 AM   #556
Pentaxian
Cynog Ap Brychan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Gloucester
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,096
Personally, I'm not bothered by the lack of a WR 35 mm or any wider lens. To my mind, a weather resistant zoom makes much more sense than a prime as it can obviate the need to change lenses in inclement weather. I would exclude telephotos from this as activities such as birding often take place in less than ideal conditions. I'm not saying there isn't a market for a WR 35mm, I'm merely suggesting that it might not be as large as some people seem to think. If you really want weather resistance, Pentax has it covered from 16mm to 300mm in its DA* range.

09-24-2013, 03:59 AM   #557
Banned




Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NY/Germany
Posts: 1,183
QuoteOriginally posted by Cynog Ap Brychan Quote
Personally, I'm not bothered by the lack of a WR 35 mm or any wider lens. To my mind, a weather resistant zoom makes much more sense than a prime as it can obviate the need to change lenses in inclement weather. I would exclude telephotos from this as activities such as birding often take place in less than ideal conditions. I'm not saying there isn't a market for a WR 35mm, I'm merely suggesting that it might not be as large as some people seem to think. If you really want weather resistance, Pentax has it covered from 16mm to 300mm in its DA* range.
The thinking here is somewhat as if there is a vacuum.

Some don't want zooms. This is established already, and Pentax, once again, prides itself on being a company built on its line of primes. Those are the ones people will get.

If prime demand wasn't huge, then Fuji would not have had $150,000,000 in revenue in the year after the introduction of the x100.

People demand primes for the best quality and fewest compromises possible. Every shoot I go to, people are using primes, whether it be astro shoots, runways in NYC, concerts, etc.

Not to mention, the DA/SDM lenses have a very poor reputaiton, plus their pricing is scaring people away from Pentax altogether. To not seal their primes, which are overpriced to begin with, also suggests shortcutting and compromise. To seal a 55 that is designed for APSc (so it has an 83mm FL) looks confused, at best. To have a 35 that is slow and expensive and to not even have a 24 (no, the slow 21 is not a replacement), all send out very bad signals of the people who were at the helm inside Pentax.
09-24-2013, 04:20 AM   #558
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2010
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,405
QuoteOriginally posted by snake Quote
Those are not "normal" focal lengths by any stretch. At best, as mentioned, the 55 is a slight telephoto. Pentax is missing two of the major "classic" focal lengths: the 35 and 50.
I would not mind havind DA*24/2... To companie my DA55
09-24-2013, 04:25 AM   #559
Pentaxian
Fogel70's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,920
I think Pentax has too many lens series in production, and it makes it difficult for them to make the lens series complete.
If they cut down lens series to at least half of them, they probably end up with a better lens line up for the future. But if they continue do the same on FF lenses as they done on APS-C lenses they could end up with 15+ different lens series.

DA L (3 zooms)
DA L WR (2 zooms)
DA (3 primes, 5 zooms)
DA Limited (5 primes)
DA WR (3 zooms)
DA AW (1 prime)
DA* (3 zooms, 3 primes)
FA (not really sure which of them still in production)
FA Limited (3 primes)
D FA (1 prime)
D FA WR (1 prime)

It's probably enough with 3-4 lens series in each of APS-C and FF.
DA L
DA WR
DA Limited
DA AW
D FA WR
D FA Limited
D FA AW

The added cost of WR is not much, so Pentax has a lot to win to make all "standard" lenses with simplified weather sealing. That might be the easiest way of making a distinctive difference from competition, and might make a big difference on Pentax image as a brand. If they can make cheap DA L zooms with WR they can easily do it on other lenses too without much added cost.

AW weather sealing is more complex and add more cost, so it should only be used on high performance lenses, and will probably mainly be used on FF lenses in the future.

09-24-2013, 08:34 AM   #560
Veteran Member
Andi Lo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,925
QuoteOriginally posted by Cynog Ap Brychan Quote
Personally, I'm not bothered by the lack of a WR 35 mm or any wider lens. To my mind, a weather resistant zoom makes much more sense than a prime as it can obviate the need to change lenses in inclement weather. I would exclude telephotos from this as activities such as birding often take place in less than ideal conditions. I'm not saying there isn't a market for a WR 35mm, I'm merely suggesting that it might not be as large as some people seem to think. If you really want weather resistance, Pentax has it covered from 16mm to 300mm in its DA* range.
I disagree, I thing the 35mm WR would really sell the pentax format. The DA 16-50 and its friends aren't exactly cheap. At the moment our only option for cheap WR is the "crummy" 18-55 50-200 kitlenses, which doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

Spec / value wise the DA 35 is a lost cause vs the Nikon AFS 35 (Nikon 35 is a very good lens), so I'd love to see a DA L 35 WR and DA L 50 WR, to make it a real selling point. I would definitely buy the 35 if prices are kept sane. Think about it: it is cheap, performs great, has wide aperture, easy to carry, virtually weightless, fully weather sealed, and its shake reduced! No other manufacturer can claim that.

I think DA 35m macro is a prime candidate for WR but seeing that we already have it redone in HD I lose hope of ever seeing it in WR flavor anytime soon

Last edited by Andi Lo; 09-24-2013 at 08:40 AM.
09-24-2013, 01:13 PM   #561
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,189
Aww, yeah, a WR prime between 24mm and 35mm would be awesome. WR, HD, silent screw drive AF, maybe internal focus and DoF scales.. would sell great, even if its not as compact as the Pentax primes usually are
09-24-2013, 01:22 PM   #562
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 535
QuoteOriginally posted by Na Horuk Quote
Aww, yeah, a WR prime between 24mm and 35mm would be awesome. WR, HD, silent screw drive AF, maybe internal focus and DoF scales.. would sell great, even if its not as compact as the Pentax primes usually are
I'd buy a 24-28mm WR prime in a hearbeat
09-24-2013, 02:10 PM   #563
Pentaxian
robjmitchell's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne Aus
Posts: 1,446
Weather seal the limited zoom on the roadmap!

09-24-2013, 02:38 PM   #564
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,721
QuoteOriginally posted by robjmitchell Quote
Weather seal the limited zoom on the roadmap!
I think the Limited Zoom on the roadmap [EDIT: This isn't right, as been pointed out below. I was referring to the DA* (approx.) 17~70, which is now only DA] isn't Limited any more, which might mean it is Weather Resistant instead.

Last edited by monochrome; 09-25-2013 at 06:14 AM.
09-24-2013, 02:52 PM   #565
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Clarkey's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,909
QuoteOriginally posted by Cynog Ap Brychan Quote
Personally, I'm not bothered by the lack of a WR 35 mm or any wider lens. To my mind, a weather resistant zoom makes much more sense than a prime as it can obviate the need to change lenses in inclement weather. I would exclude telephotos from this as activities such as birding often take place in less than ideal conditions. I'm not saying there isn't a market for a WR 35mm, I'm merely suggesting that it might not be as large as some people seem to think. If you really want weather resistance, Pentax has it covered from 16mm to 300mm in its DA* range.
Point taken, they do - with pricey lenses, but in line with the competition. As others mention, I would think there is a gap for the mid range lenses to be WR/ with DC motors. I would buy both the 17-70 and 55-300 if offered like this, at full retail.

QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
I think the Limited Zoom on the roadmap isn't Limited any more, which might mean it is Weather Resistant instead.
I'm hoping it is a rework of the 17-70 with a smaller front element, and completion of the WR (since the current 17-70 has the rear ring), together with the DC motor. And yes, I will buy one, if the optical quality is better than the 18-135mm at equivalent focal lengths.

Last edited by Clarkey; 09-24-2013 at 02:53 PM. Reason: posted prior to finishing.
09-24-2013, 02:55 PM   #566
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Clarkey's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,909
QuoteOriginally posted by snake Quote
Don't forget that Pentax really pushes the primes more than most companies, to the point that this is a reason to get into Pentax over other companies. Yet they don't have a truly fast 35 (the 2.4 is ok, but not fast), and the FA35 is pretty insanely priced, if you can get one (1,000+ Euros now in Germany). The 31 could fit that bill, to some extent.

The bigger thing is that Pentax has a confused line up; there is no WR fast 35. They are dedicated to APSc, or so we think and see, but they only made a 55 as a fast, WR lens. Few are using that as their "normal" lens.

Pentax needs to produce a WR, fast 35 for "normal" FL shooters. And finally produce a fast 24, one of the "classic" focal lengths that has resurged in popularity in the last few years. Preferably WR, to compete with the street shooting cams, like the X100, RX1, X2, and so on.

If Pentax had any vision to do so, it can make itself the choice of streetshooters, war shooters, correspondents, desert, etc. With sealed versions of those lenses. The hipsters would buy in like crazy if they found out they could shoot in the rain.
The 31 is the 600 pound gorilla in the room. Why would they want to offer a (potentially better) option than a revered (and expensive) lens.
09-24-2013, 07:41 PM   #567
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,121
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
I think the Limited Zoom on the roadmap isn't Limited any more, which might mean it is Weather Resistant instead.
The most recent roadmap I saw (linked on OP of the "new roadmap" thread) still says DA Zoom Limited, with an approximate range of 20-40mm.

Others have said this I think, but I would like to see this lens be the spiritual successor to the F35-70. How about a 20-50/3.5 the size of, say, the 35 Ltd for $800? :-) Any takers?
09-24-2013, 08:36 PM   #568
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,721
QuoteOriginally posted by filoxophy Quote
The most recent roadmap I saw (linked on OP of the "new roadmap" thread) still says DA Zoom Limited, with an approximate range of 20-40mm.

Others have said this I think, but I would like to see this lens be the spiritual successor to the F35-70. How about a 20-50/3.5 the size of, say, the 35 Ltd for $800? :-) Any takers?
[EDIT: The DA (approx.) 17~70 was originally DA*, not DA Limited. I was incorrect in this post]

The 17-70-ish (rumored to be f/2.8 constant) is no longer Limited, only the 20-40 zoom..

Last edited by monochrome; 09-25-2013 at 06:16 AM.
09-24-2013, 09:42 PM   #569
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 1,205
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
I hope Pentax will consider this WR
09-24-2013, 10:31 PM   #570
Pentaxian
Mistral75's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,464
Original Poster
It never was; it was labelled as DA*.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
da, f2.8, hd, lenses, pentax, pentax news, pentax rumors, silver, versions
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax FA 31mm f/1.8 Limited (black), Sigma UV HD 58mm CWyatt Sold Items 3 05-11-2013 10:57 PM
For Sale - Sold: DA Limited 21mm / DA Limited 35mm Macro / DA Limited 70mm top-quark Sold Items 3 04-23-2013 05:01 AM
For Sale - Sold: SMCP Pentax-DA 15mm F/4 ED AL Limited and SMCP Pentax-DA 70mm f/2.4 Limited Lenses Yosemite Sold Items 3 04-02-2013 05:29 PM
UV filters for DA limited lenses top-quark Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 04-25-2012 06:34 AM
For Sale - Sold: [EU] Pentax system, K10d, lenses (DA, DA Limited, DA*, F, M, K, Tak), flash jensm Sold Items 24 02-04-2010 04:44 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top