Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-30-2013, 03:54 AM   #646
Senior Member




Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brussels
Posts: 103
Oh, i think I'm wrong with this sentence:
QuoteQuote:
but remains way behind the nano-coatings of Canon/Nikon
The statements from PENTAX are that it is close to the Pentax's Aero-bright Coating (but I don't know how this Aero-bright coating "scores" compared to the Nikon's Nano Coating). And if PENTAX shows us a comparison between standard SMC and HD coatings, they give us no comparison with Aero-bright coating.



For the rest of my statement:
QuoteQuote:
I don't think that HD is nano-coating or may be compared to nano-coating !
It's just an improved version of the SMC coating,
I think my point of view is correct ...

See this :
QuoteQuote:
DE: You've got another coating, the "Aero Bright" coating, and it seems like both of those were used together in the 90mm. How do they differ? Are they serving different functions?

JC: The Aero Bright coating is for internal surfaces of the lens. It reduces internal reflections, and changes the refraction of the light through the lens. But it's not as durable as the HD coating, whereas the HD coating is appropriate for external lens surfaces. It's more durable, and it accomplishes the same goals. If you put them together, you end up with a great lens.

DE: Got it. I'm not sure what technology you're using, but I know that the nano coatings tend to be soft coatings, so they're very easily damaged.


JC: Yes.

from: Q&A with Pentaxís John Carlson: A deeper look inside the new MX-1, Pentaxís ILCs and lenses

Also this:
QuoteQuote:
PENTAX - PENTAX Announces New 90mm Macro Lens
HD PENTAX D FA 645 MACRO 90mm F2.8 ED AW SR lens
This lens is treated with HD Coating*, a newly developed, high grade multi-layer lens coating , which offers higher light transmittance with reduced reflection, to deliver sharp, clear images free of flare and ghosting, even under demanding lighting conditions such as backlight. By coupling this coating with the PENTAX-exclusive, high grade Aero Bright Coating,** this lens optimizes light transmittance while minimizing refraction.

* HD stands for High Definition, and signifies the lensís capacity to reproduce images that excel in transparency, definition, resolution and rendition.
** A PENTAX-original lens coating process developed through the use of advanced nanotechnology. Using a silica aerogel with a uniform porous structure as the base material, this coating produces clear, high-quality images by assuring an outstanding anti-reflection performance over a broad wavelength range.
For the Aero-bright coating, PENTAX speaks of Nanotechnology, NOT for the HD coating.


In your description, Kunzite, PENTAX does not speak of nanotechnology, but of the thickness and accuracy of the layer (and the process to achieve this). ;-)

09-30-2013, 04:48 AM   #647
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,494
Quit making stuff up and asking us to believe that the absence of a positive declaration proves a negative. Show us your science - otherwise what you "think" isn't meaningful.
09-30-2013, 05:36 AM   #648
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
QuoteOriginally posted by Winder Quote
The million dollar question is: When will we seen the FA LTDs updated? It would be nice to see update these with better coatings.

I would like to see the FA Ltd series with Aero Bright and SP Coatings.
09-30-2013, 05:41 AM   #649
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,115
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Quit making stuff up and asking us to believe that the absence of a positive declaration proves a negative. Show us your science - otherwise what you "think" isn't meaningful.
He does have a point, I'm afraid. Asking him to prove a negative won't make it go away. Where/when did Ricoh tell us nano technology was used with the HD coating?

Besides that, who cares? The SMC coating is excellent. If HD coating is only a tiny improval then they have improved on excellence. Nano-tech or not.

09-30-2013, 05:51 AM   #650
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
QuoteOriginally posted by MouLaG ‘fr Quote
Oh, i think I'm wrong with this sentence:


The statements from PENTAX are that it is close to the Pentax's Aero-bright Coating (but I don't know how this Aero-bright coating "scores" compared to the Nikon's Nano Coating). And if PENTAX shows us a comparison between standard SMC and HD coatings, they give us no comparison with Aero-bright coating.



For the rest of my statement:


I think my point of view is correct ...

See this :



Also this:


For the Aero-bright coating, PENTAX speaks of Nanotechnology, NOT for the HD coating.


In your description, Kunzite, PENTAX does not speak of nanotechnology, but of the thickness and accuracy of the layer (and the process to achieve this). ;-)
It depends on whether this is the Patent for Aero Bright or HD. Given the date, I tend to believe it is for HD.

QuoteQuote:
Quote: Abstract An anti-reflection coating comprising a mesoporous silica coating composed of mesoporous silica nano-particles formed on a substrate or a dense coating formed on the substrate, the mesoporous silica coating having a refractive index of more than 1.10 and 1.35 or less.

Imai; Hiroaki (Kanagawa, JP), Nakayama; Hiroyuki (Tokyo, JP), Shiokawa; Takanobu (Kanagawa, JP), Yamada; Kazuhiro (Saitama, JP), Suzuki; Mineta (Saitama, JP) Assignee: Keio University (Tokyo, JP)
Pentax Ricoh Imaging Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, JP)
Appl. No.: 12/393,333 Filed: February 26, 2009
09-30-2013, 05:51 AM   #651
Banned




Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NY/Germany
Posts: 1,183
QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
The SMC coating is excellent.
For the record, SMC is not one coating. It has been changed over the years.
09-30-2013, 05:56 AM   #652
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
He does have a point, I'm afraid. Asking him to prove a negative won't make it go away. Where/when did Ricoh tell us nano technology was used with the HD coating?

Besides that, who cares? The SMC coating is excellent. If HD coating is only a tiny improval then they have improved on excellence. Nano-tech or not.

According to Ricoh/Pentax:



As I pointed out in my previous post, that 2009 patent may be for HD.
09-30-2013, 06:48 AM   #653
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 8,426
MouLaG ‘fr:
- there's nothing to indicate that ABC would be inferior to other nanocoatings
- just because ABC is not suitable for external surfaces doesn't mean it's used in the internal surfaces of the HD lenses, without being mentioned. Pentax is very clear about the D FA645 90mm macro using HD and ABC.
- the soft nano-coatings are the "classic" silica nano-particle ones. I believe HD is using a different production process, as AFAIK Pentax had patents on that.

P.S. Why am I not surprised Clavius doesn't think it's necessary to prove a negative claim?


Last edited by Kunzite; 09-30-2013 at 07:04 AM.
09-30-2013, 06:52 AM   #654
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,115
QuoteOriginally posted by Blue Quote
According to Ricoh/Pentax:



As I pointed out in my previous post, that 2009 patent may be for HD.
So it is just an assumption that HD coating uses nano technology then?
09-30-2013, 06:58 AM   #655
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Greater Montreal Area
Posts: 736
What is nano technology anyway...There are so many applications and definitions.

A term that means nothing since marketing has appropriated it.
09-30-2013, 07:25 AM   #656
Site Supporter
Aristophanes's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,790
QuoteOriginally posted by mamethot Quote
What is nano technology anyway...There are so many applications and definitions.

A term that means nothing since marketing has appropriated it.
It's a marketing term only.
09-30-2013, 07:38 AM - 2 Likes   #657
Pentaxian
johnmflores's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Somerville, NJ
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Aristophanes Quote
It's a marketing term only.
It's a term from Ork:



http://valerierlawson.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/mork-nano.jpg
09-30-2013, 08:42 AM   #658
Site Supporter
Aristophanes's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,790
QuoteOriginally posted by johnmflores Quote
It's a term from Ork:
Shazbot!
09-30-2013, 09:12 AM   #659
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
So it is just an assumption that HD coating uses nano technology then?
No, I didn't make any assumption. It depends o whether the above patent is for HD or not. Given it was filed Feb 2009, I think it is possibly for HD since Aerobright was already in use on the DA* 55/1.4 etc.
09-30-2013, 09:24 AM   #660
Site Supporter
Aristophanes's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,790
HD, nano, SMC, Aerobright, are all just incremental improvements in polymer coatings similar to what contact lenses have. Their impact on durability is known, on t-stop and IQ...almost no data. Judging from the Pentax graph above the difference is minute.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
da, f2.8, hd, lenses, pentax, pentax news, pentax rumors, silver, versions
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax FA 31mm f/1.8 Limited (black), Sigma UV HD 58mm CWyatt Sold Items 3 05-11-2013 10:57 PM
For Sale - Sold: DA Limited 21mm / DA Limited 35mm Macro / DA Limited 70mm top-quark Sold Items 3 04-23-2013 05:01 AM
For Sale - Sold: SMCP Pentax-DA 15mm F/4 ED AL Limited and SMCP Pentax-DA 70mm f/2.4 Limited Lenses Yosemite Sold Items 3 04-02-2013 05:29 PM
UV filters for DA limited lenses top-quark Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 04-25-2012 06:34 AM
For Sale - Sold: [EU] Pentax system, K10d, lenses (DA, DA Limited, DA*, F, M, K, Tak), flash jensm Sold Items 24 02-04-2010 04:44 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:11 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top