Originally posted by Cynog Ap Brychan
FWIW, I've been a photographer for over 50 years (not necessarily a good photographer, but certainly a keen one). All that time, I have been very interested in the gear side of things, suffering (or rather, enjoying) a chronic case of CBA and LBA, like many on this forum. But, I have never, ever been to a camera show, and I don't think I'm untypical in this. I am left to wonder just how relevant they are to the average camera/lens buyer who make up the majority of photographic consumers. I know that the shows attract the photographic press, who then report back and can, I imagine, influence some buying decisions, but if there's nothing new there, what's to report? Many companies announcements of new products do not coincide with camera shows (Photokina being a possible exception). Surely, there are other and more cost-effective ways of marketing products, and we should not be too worried about who has the biggest and bestest booths at these shows.
Having said all that, I don't claim to have the insight of some posters, who are much more knowledgeable than I, so I could be wrong.
I think shows are good places for manufacturers and users to come and meet together, listen to each other, and benefit from mutual insights. The whole new progress is possible like that, and a bond of dependancy and mutual trust is established.
But many manufacturers don't think like that, cannot connect with customers, see all that as a nuisance and by avoiding trade shows, they also miss a vital ingredient needed for their future efforts.
I remember, a year ago PF went to Fotokina 2012 with tons of suggestions for Pentax managers and developers coming from its users. I presume they've had enough of it, and therefore will avoid all shows in the near future.