New image of K-3!?

thibs · 10-03-2013, 01:59 AM

Originally posted by StrasburgBarry

Thanks for boiling this all down to being "ridiculous and paranoid," and wanting a cookie. Childish comments are always appreciated. This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive.

You may want to read your first post again ?

snake · 10-03-2013, 02:36 AM

Originally posted by StrasburgBarry

This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras.

Incorrect.

This is an independent forum for Pentax gear fans that is NOT affiliated with, nor endorsed by Ricoh-Pentax in any way.

RonHendriks1966 · 10-03-2013, 02:41 AM

Originally posted by -Linus-

# Ron Hendriks
Mine from Webprint.nl Oldenzaal where OK, But I used the K5 only on Base ISO.

-Linus-

fotofabriek.nl has an offer for A1 print for 5 euro. Nice price to make some.

RonHendriks1966 · 10-03-2013, 02:45 AM

Originally posted by Wired

I'm trying to get my feet wet by being a second shooter with a local pro and I shoot the D800 primarily with him on hired shoots, unfortunately he gets all the images I produce and I can't use them in my flickr page. But for that setting the D800 and FF is the way to roll.

Somehow I think that someone is fooling you

Wired · 10-03-2013, 05:14 AM

Originally posted by RonHendriks1966

Somehow I think that someone is fooling you

it was actually a bit of a pain in the original negotiation for this. I'm getting paid pretty well for my services, and he hasn't raised his prices, giving me 40% of his gross. (ie, if he gets $1000 for a shoot from the client, I'm getting $400. that $1000 may include a few prints, all the processing time, travel, etc.). and it was me that approached him as a second shooter. so I don't think I'm doing too bad for what is essentially a "intership" so to speak. I get to keep the client data, and clients are allowed to contact me directly for other sessions. I'm allowed to keep the files, but not distribute without written permission from both him and the client.

the idea is that it's his name and reputation, and if I edit the way I want and throw it online and the customer sees that he could get into trouble.

Wired · 10-03-2013, 05:16 AM - **1 Like**

regarding the hump:

I think your all wrong. I have heard that this houses a quick charging capacitor. On shutter release the capacitor discharges into the new form of sensor, a liquid gel 24mp sensor. This gets rid of the need for an shake reduction motor by allowing the photosites to actually travel on their own to track camera shake. It can also track small movements, like stars.

ok.... my attempt at 6:00 am brilliance failed.

Mistral75 · 10-03-2013, 06:15 AM

Sorry for being a party pooper but the "bump" only conceals a headphone port.

Cynog Ap Brychan · 10-03-2013, 08:17 AM

The bump looks a bit ungainly to me: I hope its smaller in real life than it appears on the photo. The lens doesn't appear to be attached to the camera body properly, either. Looks to me as though it's been PhotoShopped on. I'd be very surprised if it was a headphone port. That would be poor design, indeed.

**jatrax** · 10-03-2013, 12:10 PM

Originally posted by StrasburgBarry

This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive.

Barry,
First, this is not a Pentax forum, has no relationship with RICOH or Pentax. If it did I'm sure most members would have already been banned for criticizing the brand. The owner of this site also runs a NikonForums site and has announced a CanonForums site will be coming soon.

Second, the k-3 is not a FF camera, just a replacement for the current k-5II with an APS-C sensor, so maintaining that this forum is designed only for Pentax to push FF cameras is just plain wrong on several fronts.

Third, I don't think anyone on this forum is naive about anything Pentax/Ricoh are doing, we all like the brand, for various reasons but the warts are quite visible and often pointed out.

Fourth, as far as I know no one from Pentax posts here officially or unofficially, much as we would like them to. So :

Originally posted by StrasburgBarry

This whole discussion is Pentax's effort to stir up interest in and sales of a FF format camera. Period.

is hard to believe.

You are entitled to your opinion, and as a long time Pentax user we would value your comments and experience. However, starting rumors such as what you posted does no one any good and unlike a spoken conversation, posts on the internet can and do get copied and quoted again and again, often out of context. If you have some proof that this forum is really a secret marketing tactic of Ricoh I would love to see it as I'm sure many others would.

RonHendriks1966 · 10-03-2013, 12:14 PM

Originally posted by Wired

it was actually a bit of a pain in the original negotiation for this. I'm getting paid pretty well for my services, and he hasn't raised his prices, giving me 40% of his gross. (ie, if he gets $1000 for a shoot from the client, I'm getting $400. that $1000 may include a few prints, all the processing time, travel, etc.). and it was me that approached him as a second shooter. so I don't think I'm doing too bad for what is essentially a "intership" so to speak. I get to keep the client data, and clients are allowed to contact me directly for other sessions. I'm allowed to keep the files, but not distribute without written permission from both him and the client.

the idea is that it's his name and reputation, and if I edit the way I want and throw it online and the customer sees that he could get into trouble.

Okay so there is a good win-win situation. Then you can enjoy it and learn along the line.

DogLover · 10-03-2013, 12:15 PM

Originally posted by jatrax

Barry,
First, this is not a Pentax forum, has no relationship with RICOH or Pentax. If it did I'm sure most members would have already been banned for criticizing the brand. The owner of this site also runs a NikonForums site and has announced a CanonForums site will be coming soon.

Second, the k-3 is not a FF camera, just a replacement for the current k-5II with an APS-C sensor, so maintaining that this forum is designed only for Pentax to push FF cameras is just plain wrong on several fronts.

Third, I don't think anyone on this forum is naive about anything Pentax/Ricoh are doing, we all like the brand, for various reasons but the warts are quite visible and often pointed out.

Fourth, as far as I know no one from Pentax posts here officially or unofficially, much as we would like them to. So : is hard to believe.

You are entitled to your opinion, and as a long time Pentax user we would value your comments and experience. However, starting rumors such as what you posted does no one any good and unlike a spoken conversation, posts on the internet can and do get copied and quoted again and again, often out of context. If you have some proof that this forum is really a secret marketing tactic of Ricoh I would love to see it as I'm sure many others would.

Well said!

hangman43 · 10-03-2013, 12:15 PM

Originally posted by StrasburgBarry

Thanks for boiling this all down to being "ridiculous and paranoid," and wanting a cookie. Childish comments are always appreciated. This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive.

The only problem is this forum is not run or affiliated with Pentax so Pentax does not influence the discussions on here so no it is not the objective of this discussion or any others on here to sell more Pentax Cameras

**7samurai** · 10-03-2013, 12:31 PM

I'm glad it's not run or affiliated with Pentax, don't want to get banned or de-friended like on facebook...

It is a frenzy sometimes and interesting to watch.

mamethot · 10-03-2013, 12:32 PM

Originally posted by hangman43

The only problem is this forum is not run or affiliated with Pentax so Pentax does not influence the discussions on here so no it is not the objective of this discussion or any others on here to sell more Pentax Cameras

Well I don't think Ricoh would need to stir the pot anyway, we can do it ourselves...

**jatrax** · 10-03-2013, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by 7samurai

I'm glad it's not run or affiliated with Pentax, don't want to get banned or de-friended like on facebook...

I think we would all have been banned already....................

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sale of image, requires "20x30 image size digital image" ?	NeverSatisfied	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	25	03-29-2013 05:38 AM
What is the Shutter Count of the first image of a brand new K5?	TropicalMonkey	Pentax K-5 & K-5 II	16	01-31-2013 01:45 AM
Latest FF K-3 leaked Image?	Clinton	General Talk	16	09-14-2012 06:00 AM
"Chassuer d'Image" - K-01 review = 3/5	Jean Poitiers	Pentax K-01	12	05-19-2012 10:26 PM
Which one out of the 3 image? (BW scanned)	SuperAkuma	Post Your Photos!	12	03-05-2009 08:28 PM

10-03-2013, 01:59 AM	#451
thibs Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Belgium Photos: Albums Posts: 6,947	Originally posted by StrasburgBarry Thanks for boiling this all down to being "ridiculous and paranoid," and wanting a cookie. Childish comments are always appreciated. This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive. You may want to read your first post again ?

10-03-2013, 02:36 AM	#452
snake Banned Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: NY/Germany Posts: 1,183	Originally posted by StrasburgBarry This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. Incorrect. This is an independent forum for Pentax gear fans that is NOT affiliated with, nor endorsed by Ricoh-Pentax in any way.

10-03-2013, 02:41 AM	#453
RonHendriks1966 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 9,675	Originally posted by -Linus- # Ron Hendriks Mine from Webprint.nl Oldenzaal where OK, But I used the K5 only on Base ISO. -Linus- fotofabriek.nl has an offer for A1 print for 5 euro. Nice price to make some.

10-03-2013, 02:45 AM	#454
RonHendriks1966 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 9,675	Originally posted by Wired I'm trying to get my feet wet by being a second shooter with a local pro and I shoot the D800 primarily with him on hired shoots, unfortunately he gets all the images I produce and I can't use them in my flickr page. But for that setting the D800 and FF is the way to roll. Somehow I think that someone is fooling you

10-03-2013, 05:14 AM	#455
Wired Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Edmonton, AB Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,519	Originally posted by RonHendriks1966 Somehow I think that someone is fooling you it was actually a bit of a pain in the original negotiation for this. I'm getting paid pretty well for my services, and he hasn't raised his prices, giving me 40% of his gross. (ie, if he gets $1000 for a shoot from the client, I'm getting $400. that $1000 may include a few prints, all the processing time, travel, etc.). and it was me that approached him as a second shooter. so I don't think I'm doing too bad for what is essentially a "intership" so to speak. I get to keep the client data, and clients are allowed to contact me directly for other sessions. I'm allowed to keep the files, but not distribute without written permission from both him and the client. the idea is that it's his name and reputation, and if I edit the way I want and throw it online and the customer sees that he could get into trouble.

10-03-2013, 05:16 AM - 1 Like	#456
Wired Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Edmonton, AB Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,519	regarding the hump: I think your all wrong. I have heard that this houses a quick charging capacitor. On shutter release the capacitor discharges into the new form of sensor, a liquid gel 24mp sensor. This gets rid of the need for an shake reduction motor by allowing the photosites to actually travel on their own to track camera shake. It can also track small movements, like stars. ok.... my attempt at 6:00 am brilliance failed.

10-03-2013, 06:15 AM	#457
Mistral75 Pentaxian Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Paris, France Posts: 6,962	Sorry for being a party pooper but the "bump" only conceals a headphone port.

10-03-2013, 08:17 AM	#458
Cynog Ap Brychan Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Gloucester Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,199	The bump looks a bit ungainly to me: I hope its smaller in real life than it appears on the photo. The lens doesn't appear to be attached to the camera body properly, either. Looks to me as though it's been PhotoShopped on. I'd be very surprised if it was a headphone port. That would be poor design, indeed.

10-03-2013, 12:10 PM	#459
jatrax Site Supporter Join Date: May 2010 Location: Washington Cascades Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 12,991	Originally posted by StrasburgBarry This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive. Barry, First, this is not a Pentax forum, has no relationship with RICOH or Pentax. If it did I'm sure most members would have already been banned for criticizing the brand. The owner of this site also runs a NikonForums site and has announced a CanonForums site will be coming soon. Second, the k-3 is not a FF camera, just a replacement for the current k-5II with an APS-C sensor, so maintaining that this forum is designed only for Pentax to push FF cameras is just plain wrong on several fronts. Third, I don't think anyone on this forum is naive about anything Pentax/Ricoh are doing, we all like the brand, for various reasons but the warts are quite visible and often pointed out. Fourth, as far as I know no one from Pentax posts here officially or unofficially, much as we would like them to. So : Originally posted by StrasburgBarry This whole discussion is Pentax's effort to stir up interest in and sales of a FF format camera. Period. is hard to believe. You are entitled to your opinion, and as a long time Pentax user we would value your comments and experience. However, starting rumors such as what you posted does no one any good and unlike a spoken conversation, posts on the internet can and do get copied and quoted again and again, often out of context. If you have some proof that this forum is really a secret marketing tactic of Ricoh I would love to see it as I'm sure many others would.

10-03-2013, 12:14 PM	#460
RonHendriks1966 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 9,675	Originally posted by Wired it was actually a bit of a pain in the original negotiation for this. I'm getting paid pretty well for my services, and he hasn't raised his prices, giving me 40% of his gross. (ie, if he gets $1000 for a shoot from the client, I'm getting $400. that $1000 may include a few prints, all the processing time, travel, etc.). and it was me that approached him as a second shooter. so I don't think I'm doing too bad for what is essentially a "intership" so to speak. I get to keep the client data, and clients are allowed to contact me directly for other sessions. I'm allowed to keep the files, but not distribute without written permission from both him and the client. the idea is that it's his name and reputation, and if I edit the way I want and throw it online and the customer sees that he could get into trouble. Okay so there is a good win-win situation. Then you can enjoy it and learn along the line.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-03-2013, 12:15 PM	#461
DogLover Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Tennessee Posts: 2,054	Originally posted by jatrax Barry, First, this is not a Pentax forum, has no relationship with RICOH or Pentax. If it did I'm sure most members would have already been banned for criticizing the brand. The owner of this site also runs a NikonForums site and has announced a CanonForums site will be coming soon. Second, the k-3 is not a FF camera, just a replacement for the current k-5II with an APS-C sensor, so maintaining that this forum is designed only for Pentax to push FF cameras is just plain wrong on several fronts. Third, I don't think anyone on this forum is naive about anything Pentax/Ricoh are doing, we all like the brand, for various reasons but the warts are quite visible and often pointed out. Fourth, as far as I know no one from Pentax posts here officially or unofficially, much as we would like them to. So : is hard to believe. You are entitled to your opinion, and as a long time Pentax user we would value your comments and experience. However, starting rumors such as what you posted does no one any good and unlike a spoken conversation, posts on the internet can and do get copied and quoted again and again, often out of context. If you have some proof that this forum is really a secret marketing tactic of Ricoh I would love to see it as I'm sure many others would. Well said!

10-03-2013, 12:15 PM	#462
hangman43 Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hueytown, Alabama Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,508	Originally posted by StrasburgBarry Thanks for boiling this all down to being "ridiculous and paranoid," and wanting a cookie. Childish comments are always appreciated. This IS a Pentax forum AND their objective IS to sell Pentax cameras. I never said or implied there was anything wrong with that. Only that THAT IS their objective. Once again, anyone who doesn't believe that IS being naive. The only problem is this forum is not run or affiliated with Pentax so Pentax does not influence the discussions on here so no it is not the objective of this discussion or any others on here to sell more Pentax Cameras

10-03-2013, 12:31 PM	#463
7samurai Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA Photos: Albums Posts: 474	I'm glad it's not run or affiliated with Pentax, don't want to get banned or de-friended like on facebook... It is a frenzy sometimes and interesting to watch.

10-03-2013, 12:32 PM	#464
mamethot Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Greater Montreal Area Posts: 736	Originally posted by hangman43 The only problem is this forum is not run or affiliated with Pentax so Pentax does not influence the discussions on here so no it is not the objective of this discussion or any others on here to sell more Pentax Cameras Well I don't think Ricoh would need to stir the pot anyway, we can do it ourselves...

10-03-2013, 12:34 PM	#465
jatrax Site Supporter Join Date: May 2010 Location: Washington Cascades Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 12,991	Originally posted by 7samurai I'm glad it's not run or affiliated with Pentax, don't want to get banned or de-friended like on facebook... I think we would all have been banned already....................