Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-20-2013, 06:44 PM   #241
Pentaxian
Wired's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,525
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
I've said it before, a neo-Spotmatic would be a horrible waste of a FF sensor, at least as a flagship. No pro wants to use that form factor all day. .
Especially if you pull a Nikon and price it at $3000

Maybe a stripped down FF for a $1500 price sure, or if they offered a mirrorless and a mirrored option. So a mirrorless option with a swappable viewfinder like a lot of the add-on ones for MFT cameras, just not as ugly and included in the original kit, and you could retro style this. Then a standard modern DSLR that use the K3 feature set/body.

11-21-2013, 12:29 AM   #242
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,343
Stripped down Df-like cameras are more expensive, not cheaper. The more features you're stripping down, the more you add to the price
Crippled down cameras - i.e. plastic, noisy shutters, lower quality viewfinders etc but still with all the consumer features - would be cheaper indeed, but I don't need such things. The A3000 is a good example of a crippled down camera.

Making 2 cameras instead of one won't decrease the price either.
11-21-2013, 01:21 AM   #243
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Innsbruck
Posts: 283
I think for pentax it is more usefull to make the first FF specced like the K3 for APS-C. It might not need 30MPs upwards but i think to get NEW customers to pentax it has to be a VERY good dslr.
With things like the 5d Mk III and the D800 around it has tobe "kickass", because Pentax has to offer "more bang for the buck" to get people excited and whilling to "experiement" with pentax.
11-21-2013, 01:39 AM   #244
Veteran Member
Barry Pearson's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Stockport
Posts: 870
QuoteOriginally posted by Kunzite Quote
Stripped down Df-like cameras are more expensive, not cheaper. The more features you're stripping down, the more you add to the price
Crippled down cameras - i.e. plastic, noisy shutters, lower quality viewfinders etc but still with all the consumer features - would be cheaper indeed, but I don't need such things. The A3000 is a good example of a crippled down camera.

Making 2 cameras instead of one won't decrease the price either.
True. A first Ricoh/Pentax FF digital camera needs to be equal to or exceed the K-3 in every respect. Otherwise it will be compared to the K-3 and people will think "why bother?"

QuoteOriginally posted by Mehlsack Quote
I think for pentax it is more usefull to make the first FF specced like the K3 for APS-C. It might not need 30MPs upwards but i think to get NEW customers to pentax it has to be a VERY good dslr.
With things like the 5d Mk III and the D800 around it has tobe "kickass", because Pentax has to offer "more bang for the buck" to get people excited and whilling to "experiement" with pentax.
Yes - very good. If it is "kickass", I would have the option of selling my house to buy a super camera (plus super extra lenses, I hope). If it is only so-so, I can't then get a super camera to sit alongside my K-3 (and my K-7 which has been converted to IR), even by selling my house!

11-21-2013, 02:52 AM   #245
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,343
QuoteOriginally posted by Barry Pearson Quote
True. A first Ricoh/Pentax FF digital camera needs to be equal to or exceed the K-3 in every respect. Otherwise it will be compared to the K-3 and people will think "why bother?"
Equal in specifications (except maybe the frame rate, due to a larger mirror) and clearly better in image quality, and viewfinder. They already have many components (electronics, parts of the body) which could be reused.

I also hope they'll have a proper, "full frame" AF system instead of reusing the APS-C one, clustering AF points in the center of the frame. This is another thing that won't get done by going the cheap route.

And yes, I'm prepared to pay more than what a D610 is worth.
11-28-2013, 12:33 AM   #246
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Greece
Posts: 19
Pentax Full-Frame Coming on 2014 « NEW CAMERA

Seems like the rumor is circulating ...
11-28-2013, 02:55 AM   #247
Site Supporter
Zygonyx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ile de France
Posts: 3,074
One month later ... not really up to electron's speed
11-28-2013, 09:31 AM   #248
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2011
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,735
QuoteOriginally posted by MacGreg Quote
<sarcasm>
Great site! They also offer this tidbit:

"Pentax Q will feature a APS-C sensor."
</sarcasm>

11-28-2013, 10:18 PM   #249
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,267
QuoteOriginally posted by lytrytyr Quote
<sarcasm>
Great site! They also offer this tidbit:

"Pentax Q will feature a APS-C sensor."
</sarcasm>
Hehe indeed but then the GR got that one.
The rumour was right (compact with APS-C sensor).
Name was wrong. That's the nature of rumours...
11-30-2013, 12:05 PM - 1 Like   #250
Pentaxian
aurele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Paris, France
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,967
i really love how rumors creates other rumors that are post elsewhere and that come back later and hence generates other rumors.

The rumored pentax FF is the perpetual machine
11-30-2013, 12:30 PM   #251
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,771
QuoteOriginally posted by aurele Quote
The rumored pentax FF is the perpetual machine
If Ricoh could harness the rumor mill they could bring out FF camera for almost nothing and make money on the rumors
11-30-2013, 12:41 PM   #252
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,122
No worries... Next fake Pentax FF rumor coming in a month or two.

Last edited by Clavius; 11-30-2013 at 01:59 PM.
11-30-2013, 03:15 PM   #253
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 25,868
Sounds like exactly the rumbling that was happening, just before the K-3 was released. All who nay-say are not necessarily correct, in fact there's a few posting in this thread I'm surprised are back up and running again after being stomped into the ground when the K-3 came out for release right on time with the rumour mill. I guess like baseball pitchers, it's good to have a short memory after giving up a home run. As I said right before the K-3 was released, it's a talent to know which rumours are real and which aren't. Personally I bought into the K-3 2 weeks before it was announced, just based on the number of semi-reliable and plausible sounding rumours, there are some nay sayers here who don't have nearly as good a track record.
11-30-2013, 03:19 PM   #254
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,253
I don't know. I hadn't bought full frame stock up till now, but I do think Ricoh is targeting next year for such a release. Can't say when in the year, but I suppose when Ricoh thinks its ready. No real rush from my standpoint. K3 is a nice camera to hold me over till something more comes along.
11-30-2013, 03:59 PM   #255
Pentaxian
JimmyDranox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ploiesti, Romania
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,611
From a commercial perspective, it would be a mistake as a new flagship camera will be launched earlier than six months after launching another flagship camera. And more, a year would be the optimal time.

But Pentax is in a special position because Canon, Nikon and Sony already has FF cameras, and if they wants to become a big player on the market, and K-3 seems to say that, Ricoh have to release a FF as soon as possible.

Moreover, rumors are one way to increase market interest, and Ricoh has shown us that knows how to handle these rumors before the launch of K-3. So, as I think these rumors are controlled and released intentionally.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
645d, ff, lenses, pentax news, pentax rumors, ricoh
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ricoh announces company name change - no more Pentax Ricoh Imaging, just Ricoh. rawr Pentax News and Rumors 528 10-28-2013 04:39 PM
Hoodie Pentax from Russia ogl General Talk 20 06-02-2012 06:31 AM
RICOH Establishes PENTAX RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Adam Homepage & Official Pentax News 20 10-13-2011 03:31 AM
Need Answers Quick! Good price for Pentax-M 50mm f1.7? LadyRo Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 06-03-2010 04:25 AM
Pentax France answers 3 important questions Gus Pentax News and Rumors 46 03-18-2010 10:26 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:34 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top