Originally posted by Pål Jensen A mirrorless 645 will decrease it potential marked by 90%. However, by using a ordinary designed DSLR body a 645 could be made significantly smaller. 1/3 of its depth could be shaved off. It wouldn't have to be much larger than a D800; slightly deeper though....
The 645 is only about 1cm deeper than a K-mount camera. So the potential for miniaturization is large.
Yes,
but taking into account :
- the EXTRA-SLOW new-lens-design speed we all know from Pentax (about one or two new lenses every year only), i cannot figure a MILC 645 for years unless RICOH decides to sacrify/postpone the arlesian and so looongly awaited 35mm FF -
which could by the way be an unforseen consequence of the new Sony A7/r slashed costs apparition ;
- the really specific and often dedicated use of medium format, that doesn't put compacity as a "must" for average user - and even in this respect the 645 system has nothing to "envy" to concurrence -
so the current mount and legacy 645 lenses compatibility is more reasonnable than new mount launch ;
I don't think this is gonna happen as soon as 2014, where according to
asahi man revelations, they should release 645DII.
=> imho though, it should not be 50Mpix cropped sensor : that would indeed be a mistake - first of all, it
HAS TO BE FF 645 : - As a 645D owner, i wouldn't change mine for the same size, even overpixelled, cropped sensor... - In addition, the D800 and next-to-come 24x36mm "marketing competition" must be killed. Conclusion Mr Ricoh : better take one more year to produce a killer FF 80 Mpix 645DII
And please sell it under 12 000 USD.