Originally posted by Kunzite Well designed, yes, but what problem was it supposed to solve?
I'm not completely convinced by the GXR myself, otherwise I would own one, but the module design does offer solutions to some problems. Whether these are problems that bother you is another matter.
- APS-C primes are relatively compact, but zooms are not. The GXR design allows zoom units there still very compact, with the obvious compromise that they have a smaller sensor. Actually, this is a compromise I would be prepared to make if I had some large sensor primes as well.
- According to Ricoh, it is possible to match lens to sensor more precisely than if a mount were in the way, which should result in better IQ.
- The sensor is not exposed when changing lenses, so it should be more difficult for dirt to get in. But they didn't take full advantage of this by making it WR.
Originally posted by Kunzite Sensors are tied up with the lenses, and you only have one old processing module; you can't upgrade anything.
Well, each lens unit has its own processor that handles image processing. Presumably, newer more demanding sensors would have carried more modern processors in them. The processor on the body side handles file storage and operational aspects of the body. So in effect, every body-unit combination is a dual processor system. The only bottleneck I noticed was the small buffer in the 1st (and only) generation body.
The following line-up could have tempted me. It could have been very versatile.
Bodies: Small GR-like one; large one with EVF, flash and large grip
1/1.7 units: wide zoom; normal zoom; telephoto zoom
APS-C units: 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm
Mount units: M-mount; K-mount; Q-mount