Originally posted by Kunzite Cannikin, the answers to your points (and - again - the attempted usage of real standard systems of measurement to support "equivalency") is in my previous posts. I will not repeat them.
And since you used a keyword ("narrowminded"), it's time to end our discussion.
All I have left to say is you should take a good look at your own posts and see if there is anything someone can learn from them, such as what you mean by "fragility" or why 35mm should not be used as a standard, or are they simply a collection of snide remarks, attempts to display "logical objectivity", and assertions without reasoning or example.