Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-19-2014, 09:51 AM   #796
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 711
QuoteOriginally posted by northcoastgreg Quote
There's an old Japanese lens roadmap where the DA* 200 and DA* 300 lenses are listed as "DFA" glass.



I agree. The trouble is, how do you sell an expensive lens on the basis of rendering, focus transitions, color rendition, and microcontrast when nearly reviewers, on both the internet and in print, care only about sharpness, distortion and CAs? The gearheads, with all their physics-envy inspired math, have won on this issue.
I completely agree on the aesthetic merit of a lens but the hard fact is that it is nearly impossible to measure and compare along with the reality that "beauty" has many interpretations. The optical physics and related effects can be measured and compared between different lens's. That's really the only objective measurements we have to work with.

08-19-2014, 10:59 AM   #797
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,451
QuoteOriginally posted by woodywesty Quote
I completely agree on the aesthetic merit of a lens but the hard fact is that it is nearly impossible to measure and compare along with the reality that "beauty" has many interpretations. The optical physics and related effects can be measured and compared between different lens's. That's really the only objective measurements we have to work with.
Yep but it doesn't mean those are the only measurements we should work with.
Nobody would review a car sticking only to the specs sheet. Otherwise, PDF download from the manufacturer's website is a review.
08-19-2014, 11:27 AM   #798
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,857
QuoteOriginally posted by woodywesty Quote
I completely agree on the aesthetic merit of a lens but the hard fact is that it is nearly impossible to measure and compare along with the reality that "beauty" has many interpretations. The optical physics and related effects can be measured and compared between different lens's. That's really the only objective measurements we have to work with.
Review now include bokeh comparison. To be honest this is really basic but they look at the shape of the circle highlight, if there is oinion bokeh, if there is an outlining and they say if it buzy or smooth. Example if photozone.

Few include MTF20 that are more representative on actual micro contrast on top of MTF50 that is fine sharpness (the thing you need to look at crops to notice).

There is no serious discussion through on constrast, color rendition, hability to get 3D pop (or pixie dust) and qualities of rendering transitions.

While it is very possible to test scientificaly, I never see color accurary graphs except from DxOMark. Contrast is not tested scientifically neither while it could.

I remember an article explaining that when the FA ltd where designed, the design included non fully corrected focus plan as a feature as they recognised that in practice it allowed to get more pleasing image to the eyes. Thoses FA ltd are really made to get the best images. Not to get the best tests result. Even through FA31 has a stellar performance, even on charts.
08-19-2014, 11:41 AM   #799
Veteran Member
philbaum's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Port Townsend, Washington State, USA
Posts: 3,659
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
That really is an issue - borne of our global culture's manic need to measure, sort, rank and score everything. Sharpness, distortion and CA's can be measured (relatively) objectively (if there was a universal mount so lenses could be compared on a standard sensor and camera).

The real problem, though, comes when popular fashion appreciates only the edge-to-edge sharpest images. It is one thing for a discerning lens buyer to have a different appreciation set and for a lens maker to appeal to that difference. It is another matter entirely for a photographer to sell prints that display those different image qualities.
I was trained as an engineer, and one thing you quickly learn is to look for the pros and cons of any design choice. It would be fascinating to listen to an optics designer. When one designs purely for sharpness, what do you give up instead? I don't know the answer to that, but perhaps it means more optical elements which translates to lower transmission or some such con.

In defense of the consumer, when it comes to putting out a $1000 or $5000 or $10,000 for a lens, one wants to be sure that its money well spent.

I'm a member of an art gallery, and its interesting to hear what painters consider important compared to what photographers consider important. What i find interesting is watching visitors walk down a display of paintings and photographic art, and seeing which items they stop and look at. Do they stop and look at an item just because its sharp? Nope. One can get that same experience of what people like by taking a look at which images get comments on PF, or which images get close to winning a prize in bigger contests. Its usually the picture that has a better story to tell, IMO.

08-19-2014, 12:00 PM   #800
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 711
QuoteOriginally posted by thibs Quote
Yep but it doesn't mean those are the only measurements we should work with.
Nobody would review a car sticking only to the specs sheet. Otherwise, PDF download from the manufacturer's website is a review.

I agree..... I guess that's where this forum is so valuable. There are so many fantastic photographers on the forum and they show their work and tell which lens was used and discuss the results. I continue to learn from you all. Makes choosing a new lens much easier
08-20-2014, 07:02 AM   #801
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,198
QuoteOriginally posted by northcoastgreg Quote
There's an old Japanese lens roadmap where the DA* 200 and DA* 300 lenses are listed as "DFA" glass.
well look at that there's a "DA 70-300" that got scrapped and probably the DA 55-300 replaced it.
08-20-2014, 07:32 PM   #802
Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,865
QuoteOriginally posted by philbaum Quote
Its usually the picture that has a better story to tell, IMO.
Yes, the better story and with sufficient technical excellence to not obscure or distort the telling of the tale.


Steve

---------- Post added 08-20-14 at 07:35 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by Alizarine Quote
well look at that there's a "DA 70-300" that got scrapped and probably the DA 55-300 replaced it.
Except that the DA 55-300 has been around for a loooong time. At least it was a purchase option in 2007 when I bought my K10D.


Steve
08-20-2014, 09:38 PM   #803
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,453
QuoteOriginally posted by stevebrot Quote
Except that the DA 55-300 has been around for a loooong time. At least it was a purchase option in 2007 when I bought my K10D.
That road road map is dated 2006 / 2007 so it is possible the 70-300 mentioned there was released as the 55-300. Certainly the 55-300 is not on it.

And it looks positively sparse. Perhaps those complaining in other threads that Pentax has few lenses should look at what was available in 2006. I'm not saying everything is rosey, but look at where we were and where we are. Quite a bit of progress.

08-20-2014, 09:46 PM   #804
Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,865
QuoteOriginally posted by jatrax Quote
That road road map is dated 2006 / 2007 so it is possible the 70-300 mentioned there was released as the 55-300. Certainly the 55-300 is not on it.

And it looks positively sparse. Perhaps those complaining in other threads that Pentax has few lenses should look at what was available in 2006. I'm not saying everything is rosey, but look at where we were and where we are. Quite a bit of progress.
Yes, things were sparse and it is entirely possible that the 55-300 was released along with the K10D and K100D. There were also a couple of lenses available then that are were discontinued a year or so later. It would be sort of interesting to do a full graphic of lenses available since the release of the *ist D.

Edit: I just took another look at the 2006/2007 "roadmap" and also the lens listings on Bojidar Dimitrov's Pentax K-Mount Page. I was mistaken regarding the 55-300. It did not debut until 2008, though I think it was early in the year. My office mate bought one to go with his K10D about that time. Several lenses listed for 2007 on the roadmap did not release until 2008 or 2009 including the DA 35/2.8 Limited, DA* 55/1.4, DA 17-70/4, and DA* 60-250/4. One thing that the chart did not show were the FA lenses that were still in production at the time.


Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 08-20-2014 at 10:18 PM.
08-20-2014, 11:13 PM   #805
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,453
Yeah I noticed the FA limiteds were missing. The new roadmap looks a lot fuller. But having two versions of the da limiteds does help. :-)
08-20-2014, 11:25 PM   #806
Pentaxian
Mistral75's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,283
smc Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED was announced on January 23, 2008, together with K20D, K200D, DA* 200mm f2.8, DA* 300mm f/4, DA 35mm f/2.8 Limited and DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II.

Those were the days...
08-20-2014, 11:58 PM   #807
Pentaxian
Cynog Ap Brychan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Gloucester
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,096
QuoteOriginally posted by Mistral75 Quote
smc Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED was announced on January 23, 2008, together with K20D, K200D, DA* 200mm f2.8, DA* 300mm f/4, DA 35mm f/2.8 Limited and DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II.

Those were the days...
And then came Hoya....
08-21-2014, 08:19 AM   #808
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,893
QuoteOriginally posted by Mistral75 Quote
smc Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED was announced on January 23, 2008, together with K20D, K200D, DA* 200mm f2.8, DA* 300mm f/4, DA 35mm f/2.8 Limited and DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II.

Those were the days...
Yup. I'm expecting a similar announcement (or series of announcements) at Photokina this year.

But perhaps I'm too optimistic.
08-24-2014, 12:38 AM   #809
Banned




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Back to my Walkabout Creek
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,541
QuoteOriginally posted by ElJamoquio Quote
Yup. I'm expecting a similar announcement (or series of announcements) at Photokina this year.

But perhaps I'm too optimistic.
We haven't had a lens announcement in 10 months for the K-mount.
I personally don't care a bit about new Q-S1 and K-S1, but o boy, Ricoh, don't mess around with lenses.
Is it possible a bigger lens announcement is due in few weeks?
08-24-2014, 12:59 AM   #810
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France
Photos: Albums
Posts: 804
Fingers crossed. Anyway they'll probably soon annonce HD versions of some DA*lenses.Sounds logical. And some lenses on the roadmap are still to be announced
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
645z, anniversary, body, canon, cif, dslr, ff, focus, hood, hoya, jp, lens, lenses, line, market, mf, nikon, pentax, pentax news, pentax rumors, photokina, post, pre-orders, release, ricoh, rumors, stock, train
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photokina 2014 - FF Tesla Pentax Full Frame 797 11-14-2014 11:14 PM
Official PF Photokina Meetup Adam Travel, Events, and Groups 42 09-26-2012 11:33 AM
Photokina interview larkis Pentax Medium Format 5 09-22-2012 04:36 PM
Photokina price drop? Dynasty Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 08-21-2012 04:27 PM
Predict Pentax Photokina Announcements selar Photographic Industry and Professionals 72 08-20-2012 04:04 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:11 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top