Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-24-2014, 07:23 AM   #61
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,801
Maybe they want to roll out the new finish to gauge interest and see the markets reaction before they release it on the K-1.

07-24-2014, 07:27 AM   #62
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,122
I don't understand the whining either. It looks cool. But if I have to go with the herd... They do have more important things to focus on. Like fixing the freaking mirror flapping issue that has been with them since the dawn of the K-5 and which they haven't been able to fix numerous bodies later in the K-3. Maybe they should couple the flapping to the temperature of the sensor and turn it into a feature? The first camera with active cooling?
07-24-2014, 07:30 AM   #63
Loyal Site Supporter
dadipentak's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,411
QuoteOriginally posted by Arjay Bee Quote
Please explain the barf trigger. Several scenarios come to mind.
I thought I was pretty specific. Will it make my photos prestigious? I suspect not. I could totally sabotage the whole concept by just buying one.
07-24-2014, 07:36 AM   #64
Veteran Member
VisualDarkness's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,441
I wonder if the Sony A7 series (maybe Leica) inspired the look? There are similarities.

07-24-2014, 07:52 AM   #65
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2012
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,728
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
Anyone else reminded of this?

Seriously, though, I can't understand all the complaining about this camera. This stunt probably cost them less than 5 figures to carry out, and it drums up publicity for the brand ahead of Photokina. The collectors get another body that will retain or increase in value, and no engineering time or resources are taken away from development of the next product in the line, since it is just a paint job.

And oh yeah, it's probably 2k more bodies they will sell, so an extra million or two in their coffers.
I struggle to see how they will sell an extra 2k camera bodies because of this. It's just as likely they will sell 2k fewer regular K-3 units. Not that this grey paint is a Bad Thing or anything close to it but doesn't it cause one to wonder what Ricoh thinks is important in their product offerings?
07-24-2014, 07:56 AM   #66
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 20,447
QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
They do have more important things to focus on.
Perhaps adding 2000 special units is a way to keep volume up and lines running in slow summer months, pre-Holiday sales season.

2000 units x $1,300 = $2,600,000. On a cost accounting basis, sure, they have to allocate costs to these units. But on a cash-on-cash basis, what do the components and assembler compensation really cost?

Arbitrarily assuming 50% markup from the factory door through the distribution chain to retail price, Ricoh Imaging receives $,1,742,000 for 2000 units or $871 per unit. The distribution chain gets the rest of the $2,600,000.

Assuming the sensor, processor, shutter and other procured components cost $330, inventory cash-cost was $2.00 (to go get the parts off the shelf) of Ricoh-manufactured parts, assembly actually cash-cost $35 and the shell cost $4.00, Ricoh Imaging made $1,000,000 cash-basis doing this PE K-3.

Just a guess, but I'd bet $1,000,000 is a pretty standard target cash net for a special edition.

Last edited by monochrome; 07-24-2014 at 08:41 AM.
07-24-2014, 08:18 AM - 3 Likes   #67
Pentaxian
dcshooter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Washington DC
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,607
Because it's aimed at collectors, not the general buying public. They tend to be completists and get one of each variation.

Based on how it's played out with the past silver editions, still others will sell their original K-3 bodies and replace with this. The people who buy those used K-3s generally aren't looking to purchase on the new market anyway, so they don't constitute lost sales. Very few of these will be bought instead of a new, standard black K-3, especially considering that it is now well into the K-3's lifecycle, and there are far fewer people holding out for a special edition than there were with the earlier silver special edition.

Additionally, getting the K-3 back on the front page of dpreview and other photo sites will no doubt create more interest in the platform than would otherwise have existed, translating to more sales of both the black and Prestige versions. It's marketing 101.

QuoteOriginally posted by IchabodCrane Quote
I struggle to see how they will sell an extra 2k camera bodies because of this. It's just as likely they will sell 2k fewer regular K-3 units. Not that this grey paint is a Bad Thing or anything close to it but doesn't it cause one to wonder what Ricoh thinks is important in their product offerings?

Last edited by dcshooter; 07-24-2014 at 08:29 AM.
07-24-2014, 08:20 AM   #68
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,893
QuoteOriginally posted by Cynog Ap Brychan Quote
did not so many people find the silver version attractive (I think it looks much better in the flesh)?
Never seen it in person.

I thought the K-5 silver ones were really nice. The K-3 silver was too light of a silver for my taste.

07-24-2014, 08:25 AM - 1 Like   #69
Pentaxian
dcshooter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Washington DC
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,607
I'm sure such problems are being worked on by actual engineers.

All something like this takes is changing some paint/screen print dye tanks on the assembly line that produces the outer shell and some work by the design department for the special packaging. The engineers have no doubt continued to work on whatever they are working on (fixes, new products, etc.) without a moment's interruption by this project.

QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
I don't understand the whining either. It looks cool. But if I have to go with the herd... They do have more important things to focus on. Like fixing the freaking mirror flapping issue that has been with them since the dawn of the K-5 and which they haven't been able to fix numerous bodies later in the K-3. Maybe they should couple the flapping to the temperature of the sensor and turn it into a feature? The first camera with active cooling?
07-24-2014, 08:58 AM   #70
Junior Member
Gooj's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sweden / Lappland
Posts: 27
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
I'm sure such problems are being worked on by actual engineers.

All something like this takes is changing some paint/screen print dye tanks on the assembly line that produces the outer shell and some work by the design department for the special packaging. The engineers have no doubt continued to work on whatever they are working on (fixes, new products, etc.) without a moment's interruption by this project.
Yeah exactly. It's not like you need 10 people to set and start a microwave.

Anyways, I found it to be quite a attractive colour.
07-24-2014, 09:10 AM   #71
Site Supporter
Susinok's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 478
I love the look. Someday I'll be in the market for a K-3, but I will not spend extra on a fancy color. I'd rather save up for a Bigma...
07-24-2014, 09:22 AM - 1 Like   #72
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: GMT +10
Photos: Albums
Posts: 10,844
QuoteOriginally posted by Arjay Bee Quote
bugger waiting for the ephemeral FF to materialise
Wash your mouth out, heretic. Some of us are still FF believers.
07-24-2014, 09:32 AM   #73
Pentaxian
Cambo's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 864
QuoteOriginally posted by rawr Quote
EDIT:
I also notice the large image Ricoh is distributing of this new K-3 that is in the write up on the front page (here) is shot using a Hasselblad H20-v digital back, probably on a Phase One body. The studio deleted the camera make and model from the EXIF, but other details are still in the EXIF. Sigh. Why no 645Z?
Now THIS is a major gaffe. They obviously sent it out to a major product photographer and never even thought about this. This was a dumb, dumb move.



Cheers,
Cameron
07-24-2014, 09:45 AM   #74
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,343
The only ones thinking about it are probably us. Why is so important? Is it even possible to force a studio to switch their tools on a short notice? How would it work, giving them cameras, lenses, accessories for free, plus intensive training?
07-24-2014, 10:00 AM   #75
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2012
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,728
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
Because it's aimed at collectors, not the general buying public. They tend to be completists and get one of each variation.

Based on how it's played out with the past silver editions, still others will sell their original K-3 bodies and replace with this. The people who buy those used K-3s generally aren't looking to purchase on the new market anyway, so they don't constitute lost sales. Very few of these will be bought instead of a new, standard black K-3, especially considering that it is now well into the K-3's lifecycle, and there are far fewer people holding out for a special edition than there were with the earlier silver special edition.
If this is all true, why wouldn't Ricoh make 20,000 instead of 2,000?

QuoteQuote:
Additionally, getting the K-3 back on the front page of dpreview and other photo sites will no doubt create more interest in the platform than would otherwise have existed, translating to more sales of both the black and Prestige versions. It's marketing 101.
Agree. Even lukewarm pub is better than nothing.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
body, camera, cost, da*, edition, ff, inventory, k-3, k-3 prestige edition, k-5, kennedy, lens, lenses, line, makers, model, pentax, pentax k-3 prestige, pentax news, pentax rumors, picture, prestige, production, releases, ricoh, sales, service, titanium, units
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K-3 Officially Announced (See our detailed preview here!) Adam Pentax News and Rumors 213 11-18-2014 01:46 AM
Pentax K-3 Photo Contest: Finalists Announced - Round 2 Instructions Adam Pentax K-3 Photo Contest 98 07-11-2014 05:58 AM
Pentax K-3 Premium Silver + Grip - Limited Edition Sorver Pentax Price Watch 2 05-25-2014 05:13 PM
Pentax K-3 Silver Edition $1399 dgrPhotos Pentax Price Watch 18 04-27-2014 10:19 AM
For Sale - Sold: Pentax MZ-3 Special Edition and Normal Silver Edition w/ Accessories frank Sold Items 2 11-22-2012 10:06 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top