Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-31-2014, 07:44 AM - 1 Like   #1276
ogl
Pentaxian
ogl's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Siberia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,112
Dear friends, please, understand me. To say honest, I'm indifferent to K-S1 as photocamera in reality.

I know that Ricoh has outstanding cameras - K-5IIs, K-50, GR, K-3 and 645Z...
I don't like the direction of thoughts in K-S1. And it's all.

If Ricoh offer GRII, K-1 FF or anything really cool as photo tool.... let K-S1 be like new K-01. Strange sample of designer's thought.
I hope.

08-31-2014, 09:43 AM - 2 Likes   #1277
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,812
Well,

I have been on the road since this was announced and have been scanning the pages of this thread reading various comments. I have looked at the specs etc and have come to the conclusion that I like this camera. Is it perfect - no. But I like it.

My least used Pentax camera is my PZ 1p. I purchased it new in 1998 and probably haven't run 5 rolls of film through it. It simply is way to complex and doesn't help me take better photographs. At the same time I got it I also purchased a Pentax ZX-5n. Absolutely love it. It became my primary film camera after my two Ricoh XRM's wore out. I have no need for 15 modes on a camera. I still have no idea what Hyper Mode is/was and have no desire to learn about it. It may be that since my first SLR was a Mamiya/Sekor 500 DTL I don't see the need for anything other than a spot and averaging meter on a camera. As cameras became more automated the quality of my images went down for awhile because it was too tempting to simply push the button without thinking through the process of what I was trying to accomplish. I still do this on occasion.

I work for what is left of Kodak and have spent the last couple of decades evaluating image quality more than anything else. Because of this, when I see a new image I look at technical quality before image content. This camera would allow the technical quality of my images to go up and I like that. I really don't care if it has blinkig LED's or not. Can it help me take a better photograph? If it can, then I am all for it,
08-31-2014, 10:07 AM   #1278
Site Supporter
Cynog Ap Brychan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Gloucester
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,090
I was only kidding about making selfies illegal... Heck, I've even been known to take a couple myself (though with a DSLR, rather than a phone). Self portraits have been with us longer than photography, and long may they remain.
08-31-2014, 11:58 AM   #1279
K-9
Pentaxian
K-9's Avatar

Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,962
QuoteOriginally posted by Kunzite Quote
It's not a joke. People were using non-swivel LCD cameras (phone cameras included) to take selfies for ages. Solutions were implemented to make it easier, e.g. mirrors and lousy front cameras (lousy cameras for lousy selfies, that's just right); Pentax have LEDs.
The idea that people considers lousy front cameras good enough, but require a live view image for precise composition (which, for cameras, means twisting the LCD each and every time) is... intriguing. Perhaps the only thing they care is to have their faces in the image? Perhaps they would like to just point the cameras to themselves and shoot?
Any selfie expert around here which can explain?
People have accepted the lousy, front facing selfies, so it's going to be hard to get them to step up to a camera where selfies have to be done with a tripod and cable release. It's not going to happen. They won't trade their phones in for this, especially at this price, and especially considering the one way they could have continued their selfie sharing would have been a swivel LCD with Wi-Fi, which this body does not have.

QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
A cellphone is simply a better tool for a selfie.
You're answering to my side of this argument, and I'm not sure you even realize it. With the cell phone being the easier tool, it's a harder sell for that crowd who will no longer be able to take easy selfies.

I personally hate the distortion you get when using your front facing phone or iPad camera.

08-31-2014, 12:34 PM   #1280
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,432
QuoteOriginally posted by K-9 Quote
You're answering to my side of this argument, and I'm not sure you even realize it.

With the cell phone being the easier tool, it's a harder sell for that crowd who will no longer be able to take easy selfies. I personally hate the distortion you get when using your front facing phone or iPad camera.
Actually, I do realize it and I reject the argument that this camera should be for selfies. That is something made up here - or by Ricoh USA.

This is a very good mid-range camera with a 100% coverage .95x optical viewfinder. It is built for people who take pictures from the rear of a camera, not the front. Using this for selfies would just be stupid. Adding features that you'd use for selfies would be a waste of cost in a competitive price point. Substituting selfie features for useful features (say the 100% OVF or the metal frame) would change the character of the camera.

Hinged LCD is for : Tripods, low angle or uncomfortable positions and some waist-level.
WiFi is for: - I'm not sure what beyond remote control and maybe production tethering, but certainly not Instagram (and there is an OEM and a third-party optional accessory for those who want to link their camera to a mobile device). There is a far more efficient technology already available for file transfer - take the card out; insert it in your computer USB or card slot.
LED's are for: the same thing a flashing red countdown timer is for. Just a different emulation of the same feature.

I'll concede there are legitimate, photographic uses for a hinged LCD. If it is justified on a 645Z it is justified on every dSLR Pentax makes, but not for selfies. There is no other real, useful reason to add the other features to a Pentax camera. Pentax made a business decision to implement a different solution to the need. If we don't like their decision, we know what to do.
08-31-2014, 12:37 PM   #1281
Pentaxian
RonHendriks1966's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,556
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Actually, I do realize it and I reject the argument that this camera should be for selfies. That is something made up here - or by Ricoh USA.

The other way around. Ricoh should make a camera that serves the selfie crowd a little bit better to get them back into the serious camera life. When 90 % of you images are selfies and little crowds of friends for facebook and all those other sites, then it should stand out in that point.
08-31-2014, 12:42 PM - 3 Likes   #1282
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,892
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
WiFi is for: - I'm not sure what beyond remote control and maybe production tethering, but certainly not Instagram (and there is an OEM and a third-party optional accessory for those who want to link their camera to a mobile device). There is a far more efficient technology already available for file transfer - take the card out; insert it in your computer USB or card slot.
How many people use take the card out of their phone, transfer their picture to their computer, and upload it to the internet?

Even though I would never use it, Pentax should have a 'publish' button on the camera. And wifi. That's the level of ease people are expecting.
08-31-2014, 12:59 PM   #1283
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,432
QuoteOriginally posted by ElJamoquio Quote
How many people use take the card out of their phone, transfer their picture to their computer, and upload it to the internet?

Even though I would never use it, Pentax should have a 'publish' button on the camera. And wifi. That's the level of ease people are expecting.
Ho many phones DON'T have an embedded web browser? How many phones DON'T have an EMEI number and are part of a Cell Phone Plan? How many phones DON'T have apps downloaded from the Internet over 4G or Starbucks Wi-Fi.

How many dSLR's DO have an embedded web browser? How many dSLR's DO have an EMEI number and can join a cellular network - that's what's required to make a 'Publish' button work. Facebook and Twitter and Instagram exist on the Internet.

A SmartPhone is a perfect snapshot and selfie device. That's why they've destroyed the compact INDUSTRY in just 5 years. A camera doesn't have a direct link to the cell network and doesn't have Android or iOSx (when that was tried it didn't work) and it doesn't have apps embedded.

If you HAVE to open a K-S1 jpeg in Instagram and do all that foofaraw to make a cute post - fine - use a FluCard or Eye-Fi to transfer the image. Your device can access the internet over Starbucks' WiFi or your parents' 4G Family Talk Plan

If you want remote control or tablet image view - fine - get a FluCard.

But don't make me pay for the kiddies' obsession unless there is a legitimate use for a wireless connection to a device that DOES have an EMEI number.

08-31-2014, 01:00 PM   #1284
ogl
Pentaxian
ogl's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Siberia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,112
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote

WiFi is for: There is a far more efficient technology already available for file transfer - take the card out; insert it in your computer USB or card slot..
Dear friend, do you really live in 2014?
08-31-2014, 01:04 PM   #1285
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,159
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
How many phones DON't have an EMEI number and are part of a Cell Phone Plan? How many phones DON'T have apps downloaded from the Internet over 4G or Starbucks Wi-Fi.

A SmartPhone is a perfect snapshot and selfie device. That's why they've destroyed the compact INDUSTRY in just 5 years. A camera doesn't have a direct link to the cell network and doesn't have Android or iOSx (when that was tried it didn't work) and it doesn't have apps embedded.

If you HAVE to open a K-S1 jpeg in Instagram and do all that foofaraw to make a cute post - fine - use a FluCard or Eye-Fi to transfer the image. If you want remote control or tablet image view - fine - get a FluCard.

But don't make me pay for the kiddies' obsession unless there is a legitimate use for a wireless connection to a device that DOES have an EMEI number.
I agree but at the same time, a lot of people here think the same about Video and the reply thay get is 'what the heck if that makes the damn thing sell like hot cakes'.
Some don't even agree about the on board flash. I for one, I'm happy to have that stupid flash to trigger another one.
This is the same kind of things. I don't give a *hit about it but if it sells cams, well... I'll disable wifi and that's it.
08-31-2014, 01:11 PM   #1286
ogl
Pentaxian
ogl's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Siberia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,112
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
How many phones DON't have an EMEI number and are part of a Cell Phone Plan? How many phones DON'T have apps downloaded from the Internet over 4G or Starbucks Wi-Fi.

A SmartPhone is a perfect snapshot and selfie device. That's why they've destroyed the compact INDUSTRY in just 5 years. A camera doesn't have a direct link to the cell network and doesn't have Android or iOSx (when that was tried it didn't work) and it doesn't have apps embedded.

If you HAVE to open a K-S1 jpeg in Instagram and do all that foofaraw to make a cute post - fine - use a FluCard or Eye-Fi to transfer the image. If you want remote control or tablet image view - fine - get a FluCard.

But don't make me pay for the kiddies' obsession unless there is a legitimate use for a wireless connection to a device that DOES have an EMEI number.
What are you talking about? Do you really think that camera needs Android, Windows Phone or iOSx to go to internet or to send photos to PC or to smartphone?

Man, have a look at Samsung NX1000 For example.
Samsung NX1000 review | Digital slrs/hybrids Reviews | TechRadar

Or at OLD P&S cameras - Samsung ST1000.

A lot of Canon cameras have Wi-Fi.
EOS70D, 6D, Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II, Canon PowerShot S120, Canon PowerShot G16 and e.t.c

Last edited by ogl; 08-31-2014 at 01:17 PM.
08-31-2014, 01:30 PM   #1287
Site Supporter
Clothears's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 124
QuoteOriginally posted by JPT Quote
Then they added a lot of useful features like SR, weather sealing, an extra control dial, pentaprism viewfinder.
In what sense do you mean "added a pentaprism"? All Pentaxes I've owned since 1970 have had a pentaprism.
08-31-2014, 01:33 PM   #1288
Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Liverpool, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 12,284
QuoteOriginally posted by Clothears Quote
In what sense do you mean "added a pentaprism"? All Pentaxes I've owned since 1970 have had a pentaprism.
Many of the lower end AF SLRs and DSLRs had a pentamirror rather than a pentaprism. The K-r is the last Pentax DSLR to have a pentamirror.

For example. The *ist had a pentaxmirror, but the *istD had a pentaprism. The *istDS had a pentaprism, but the *istDL had a pentamirror.

The K1xxD, and K200D had pentamirrors, but the K10D & K20D had pentaprisms.

The K-m (K2000), K-x, & K-r had pentamirrors, but when the K-30 came out Pentax announced that all future Pentax DSLRs would have 100% coverage pentaprisms. All of the low to medium end Canikons have pentamirrors.

Last edited by boriscleto; 08-31-2014 at 01:42 PM.
08-31-2014, 01:38 PM   #1289
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,892
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
How many phones DON'T have an EMEI number and are part of a Cell Phone Plan?
Probably more than there are Pentax DSLR's sold. Let's expand the definition of phones to tablets+phones and now we're talking 1000's of times the number of Pentax DSLR's sold.


QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
How many phones DON'T have apps downloaded from the Internet over 4G or Starbucks Wi-Fi.

How many dSLR's DO have an embedded web browser? How many dSLR's DO have an EMEI number and can join a cellular network - that's what's required to make a 'Publish' button work.
No, it isn't. Wifi. Wifi. Wifi. They need wifi and a 'publish' button. No 'embedded' web browser required. How many phones have an 'embedded' web browser? I thought they were all software, myself.



QuoteQuote:
Facebook and Twitter and Instagram exist on the Internet.
Which is why a facebook DSLR should have wifi.

QuoteQuote:
But don't make me pay for the kiddies' obsession unless there is a legitimate use for a wireless connection to a device that DOES have an EMEI number.
The kiddies outnumber you, and you should want THEM to pay for your DSLR obsession.
08-31-2014, 01:42 PM   #1290
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,432
Cut it out.

You know you can't Publish without a Browser. You have to access a device that has a browser whether you do it on Stabucks' WiFi or your linked phone or a tablet, with or without an EMEI. All you can do is transfer iamges to another device - that has a web browser.

A FluCard of Eye-Fi is just as good as embedded Wi-Fi.

Good Grief - a FluCard OPERATES in a WEB BROWSER.

QuoteOriginally posted by ElJamoquio Quote
The kiddies outnumber you, and you should want THEM to pay for your DSLR obsession.
They already have a perfect internet-connected photo device for the uses they presently seem to want.
QuoteOriginally posted by ElJamoquio Quote
No, it isn't. Wifi. Wifi. Wifi. They need wifi and a 'publish' button. No 'embedded' web browser required. How many phones have an 'embedded' web browser? I thought they were all software, myself.
Actually, all the SmartPhones. And tablets.

Last edited by monochrome; 08-31-2014 at 01:48 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
af, camera, care, colour, design, ff, flash, format, iso, k-01, k-3, k3, kit, kit lens, leds, lens, level, look, medium, pentax, pentax k-s1, pentax news, pentax rumors, performance, price, scheme, steve, value
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some Thoughts on the K-01 and Mirrorless From Pentax Biro Pentax Mirrorless Cameras 108 06-25-2014 03:20 PM
Mirrorless K-Mount Camera Joshua A Photographic Industry and Professionals 12 08-22-2013 04:28 AM
K-mount mirrorless....FF RonHendriks1966 Pentax Full Frame 13 05-28-2013 03:13 PM
Waiting on my first mirrorless: K-01! Penta Welcomes and Introductions 2 01-30-2013 05:49 AM
New Pentax: K-5, K-r and Mirrorless models coming JohnBee Pentax News and Rumors 32 08-08-2010 01:57 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top