Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-03-2014, 07:40 PM   #1441
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,288
QuoteOriginally posted by Aristophanes Quote
Lightroom is overkill for 90% of DSLR shooters.
QuoteOriginally posted by Aristophanes Quote
Small scale edits and DAM should be automated as much as possible with a seamless back-and-forth between devices. In one sense the SD card should be seen more and more as the backup, or the second copy.
When I am teaching or at least advising a new photographer they usually 'get' the camera stuff but when I start harping about DAM and backups and keywording and titles and finding images later they always glaze over. They do not 'get' it, they just want to take pictures. And have those end up in some safe 'cloud' thing so that they can find them again with their phone or tablet.

Totally foreign to me, I'm Lightroom-centric, everything I do revolves around Lightroom. But excellent point, likely 90% of dslr users have never used it and wouldn't if you gave it to them. It is too complicated and way overkill to take pictures of the family vacation. Sadly my family is still waiting for pictures of our last vacation almost a year ago. They are in Lightroom, as DNG's waiting to be processed. Hmmm.......

09-03-2014, 07:46 PM   #1442
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,483
QuoteOriginally posted by jatrax Quote
Totally foreign to me, I'm Lightroom-centric, everything I do revolves around Lightroom. But excellent point, likely 90% of dslr users have never used it and wouldn't if you gave it to them. It is too complicated and way overkill to take pictures of the family vacation. Sadly my family is still waiting for pictures of our last vacation almost a year ago. They are in Lightroom, as DNG's waiting to be processed. Hmmm.......
I was fine with PSE and PS pre-CS but Lightroom is completely opaque to me (and I don't mean the gray interface). To this day I cannot find a single file Lightroom has imported. Consequently I shoot mostly jpeg now, I don't rename, I don't folderize and I hate PP. That has a lot to do with (100% to do with) why I haven't posted anything in forever.

I sold a few items last month and did a batch resize and Auto-Process in PSE - that was just great. But who cares about FS images?

I understand why 90% of consumers don't use anything but whatever Apple does when you import to iPhoto.
09-03-2014, 08:40 PM   #1443
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,288
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
To this day I cannot find a single file Lightroom has imported. Consequently I shoot mostly jpeg now, I don't rename, I don't folderize and I hate PP. That has a lot to do with (100% to do with) why I haven't posted anything in forever.
I am fighting the urge to get on a plane, fly to St Louis and show you how it works Grrrr. But that is exactly the response I got from the last three people I tried to teach. They just want to take pictures.

The sad thing is given 20 minutes of proper setup I can have the default import preset loading, renaming, saving in proper folders, applying a develop preset good enough for 90%, making a backup and exporting a moderate sized jpeg for uploading all in one import batch. Click, go for coffee, done. But without spending a week or more figuring out how all that worked it would be a mystery to me too. Just too complicated for the average user.

I did not even try to explain it to my wife, she could care less, I just exported my settings, imported them to her computer, set everything up the way it made sense to me, wrote out simple instructions on a Post-it and let her go. Outside of a tendency to forget to keyword, she is doing just great.
09-03-2014, 09:36 PM - 3 Likes   #1444
Pentaxian
Uluru's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Back to my Walkabout Creek
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,400
Think of like this: if a camera could use a 35mm film to deliver same and instant results as a Polaroid, digital photography would never be needed.
Same with RAW developing; if we can bypass the clumsiness of the digital negative and deliver very well acceptable JPEG (read, today's Polaroid), then such a camera shall have a larger supporter group and more use.

That is why the stupidest cameras we have ever seen — the smartphone — is becoming de facto photographic tool of today. Because there is no visible RAW in it. RAW is irrelevant step. That step of handicapped obsession with the irrelevant is gone in smartphones, and people get an instant Polaroid. That is why smartphones are so popular photographic tools, because camera makers and software makers for cameras have just duplicated all the clumsiness of the film, to the last boring point of it, while smartphone makers have realised how to shorten the way. (And sell you all that on a monthly plan, with an excuse you can also make the so called "phone calls" with your instant camera).

Investing in superior and highly capable JPEG engines, and finding a way to access that power instantly and without fuss, increasing the computing power of the camera and NOT relying on computing power of a desktop machine to deliver an acceptable photograph, is the only way.

Cameras that deserve the title of "being with you always" must have
(A) superior JPEG engines,
(B) sufficient computing power,
(C) sufficient internal memory,
(D) use SD cards only as backups, not primary memory bank.
(E) reasonably well wirelessly connected / controlled (with an option to turn that off completely)

Form factor, etc. comes last as is dictated with optics first, or, "how big you want your lens to be"?

But the real trouble is that traditional Japanese camera companies think the opposite: form factor first, THEN stumble over every single rock mentioned in steps from E down to A.


Last edited by Uluru; 09-03-2014 at 09:45 PM.
09-03-2014, 10:17 PM   #1445
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 26,213
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
To this day I cannot find a single file Lightroom has imported.
It is a rule of life that we lose things because were were not careful where we put them. Copy the files into the catalog file structure at import directly from the SD card and have them sorted into folders by capture date. Assign keywords at import time. Add additional keywords after import and assign to new or existing collections as needed. If you don't have time to do it properly the most recent import is available until overwritten. You may also stash references in the "temporary collection" until you have finished with the categorization.


Steve

(Is this far enough off-topic?)

---------- Post added 09-03-14 at 10:41 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by Uluru Quote
Same with RAW developing; if we can bypass the clumsiness of the digital negative and deliver very well acceptable JPEG (read, today's Polaroid), then such a camera shall have a larger supporter group and more use.
You mean sort of like the first wave of digital cameras? When I bought my Canon G2 back in the Dark Ages, RAW capabilities were a relatively rare value-added feature.

As for 35mm film with Polaroid capabilities ==> no need for digital...You totally lost me. The power of digital is that the captures have almost no physical reality, that and the immediate gratification of rear LCD viewing. People loved their consumer Polaroids cameras, but hated the bulk of the capture media and the amount of trash associated with the culls and the relative expense per image. One hour minilabs provided very quick access to finished prints for 35mm users, but even then there was the matter of boxes full of snapshots and hard-to-keep-track-of negatives. Digital photography was a Godsend to the snapshot photographer.

Direct-to-the-cloud image capture is an intriguing concept whose time may very well have come. It relieves the casual user of the tedium of maintaining the hardware needed for image storage. The ongoing expense for that storage and the bandwidth costs for viewing/working with the images may get a bit old, but if nobody makes money, it is a cinch that nothing will ever happen.

Coming back to the K-S1, a single-step wireless solution through a smartphone/tablet proxy would be a nice feature. In the meantime, however, simply mounting the SD card filesystem onto a compatible tablet or phone to publish to the cloud can accomplish much the same thing. Perhaps they may even find a way to do it easily without a wire


Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 09-03-2014 at 10:42 PM.
09-03-2014, 10:41 PM   #1446
Senior Member




Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary, AB CA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 292
QuoteOriginally posted by Uluru Quote
Cameras that deserve the title of "being with you always" must have
(A) superior JPEG engines,
I agree with your entire post. The one thing that I keep wishing for is a decently behaving compression scheme that could get quick universal adoption so I can once-and-for-all put a the proverbial 10 foot pole between myself and JPEG.

It's not that I hate JPEG's - I don't! It's obvious that having a shareable file instantly in your device that is displayable 'anywhere' is almost priceless.

But I'm not a fan of how the algorithm works internally... Given that there are similar formats that suck less, and can encode enough colour data to make post-shot white balance adjustments just as good as with RAW, I'd rather the universe just woke up one day and 'got it'.

Rant aside, when I'm on vacation I often switch to JPEG mode, and usually a jazzy preset for a bit of color, contrast and sharpness punch. It's not like I'll ever edit those shots... print, share, or display, yes. But edit? Nope. Assuming I'm getting what I like SOOC, I can't complain (and don't notice) the JPEG-iness of the images unless I'm peeping at 100%'s.
09-03-2014, 11:19 PM   #1447
Pentaxian
Uluru's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Back to my Walkabout Creek
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,400
QuoteOriginally posted by noser Quote
I agree with your entire post. The one thing that I keep wishing for is a decently behaving compression scheme that could get quick universal adoption so I can once-and-for-all put a the proverbial 10 foot pole between myself and JPEG.
It is all about practicality and engagement to use camera more, not use computer more.
Say, why some company does not think like following:

1. Let's put 32GB or internal memory in this camera.
2. Lets ut some great computing power.
3. Split the memory in two: 16GB for RAW storage, and then leave 16 GB for JPEGs, which can be made on the fly in, say, two pre-sets user wanted. As an illustration, one set of JPEGs for Fuji Provia simulation, one for 2MP web and social media version.

One click of a shutter release button creates three files and all is done on the fly, as camera has sufficient computing power and internal memory. When connecting to a computer, all is downloaded. Instead of boring DCIM folders with incomprehensible file names, folders are sorted and named by Months and by user's name for example. Then when the camera is idle, data is backed up silently onto an SD, NOT written down on SD during the image recording session which slows everything down. When the internal storage comes to 80% of capacity, camera warns you on the back LCD.

Voila! Zero computer work afterwards needed. Or at least, minimum of computer work, only if some other than preferred JPEG setting is to be used. Why someone does not implement something as simple and engaging as this is beyond me. Japanese cameras today, when compared to smartphones, are tech from the stone age.

Last edited by Uluru; 09-04-2014 at 03:56 AM.
09-04-2014, 12:19 AM   #1448
Pentaxian
RonHendriks1966's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,556
QuoteOriginally posted by digital029art Quote
Sony version of K-S1 is even more compact:

Sony madness becomes real: E-mount QX1 officially announced :) | Mirrorless Rumors

The future is here!
I was looking at that too. Sounds great, but actually I never seen one in use. Now the aps-c e-mount looks even better on paper. Put it on that lenovo 6 inch phablet and you have a great tool. Somehowe it can work excellent as a portraitcamera with just the one great lens on it. But it's still aps-c while a FF sensor and just the one new 50mm Loxia lens sounds great to me.

09-04-2014, 03:35 AM   #1449
Pentaxian
ZombieArmy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 737
QuoteOriginally posted by RonHendriks1966 Quote
I was looking at that too. Sounds great
It sounds great but is inherently flawed, especially with how tablet/phone designs are being done today. It's a good walk around camera, but it's terrible for vacations or other more serious excursions simply because most tablets and phones today do not allow interchangeable batteries (besides samsung). If your tablet or phone dies, well you're just SoL unless you're carrying around one of those on the go chargers, but that's just even more bulk.

If a consumer wants an interchangeable lens system with a low profile it just makes so much more sense to get a system like the Q, Pansonic GX7 or the Sony NEX/a6000. They're easy to use, light weight and in the case of the Q, very well priced.


As an added bonus, with the last time they did this as a point and shoot version the app was horribly buggy and offered limited manual control. Just food for thought.
09-04-2014, 03:40 AM   #1450
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern Indiana
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,954
The ergonomics of using a phone or tablet for "serious" photography are poor. They are fine for snap shots/selfies, but the idea of going somewhere and shooting say 50 photos with one of these devices makes me tired just thinking about it.
09-04-2014, 04:46 AM   #1451
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2012
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,728
Notice that the two least camera-centric companies making cameras (Samsung, Sony) are the two that are further along with some of the ideas floated here in the past couple of pages.
09-04-2014, 05:34 AM   #1452
Site Supporter
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: 1hr north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,480
QuoteOriginally posted by IchabodCrane Quote
Notice that the two least camera-centric companies making cameras (Samsung, Sony) are the two that are further along with some of the ideas floated here in the past couple of pages.
Both electronic megagiants
no wonder some of us want simpler cameras. If only Pentax still had a warehouse of k-x chips to wire into updated safox/prime, M mode/DNG only. Or do we also 'demand' no safox, manual focus too w/split screen? And oh yes it has to be ugly* to keep forum chat strong!

* Like how I worked the K-s1 theme back into our thread? Was that wrong?
09-04-2014, 05:50 AM   #1453
Pentaxian
RonHendriks1966's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,556
QuoteOriginally posted by jimr-pdx Quote
Both electronic megagiants
no wonder some of us want simpler cameras. If only Pentax still had a warehouse of k-x chips to wire into updated safox/prime, M mode/DNG only. Or do we also 'demand' no safox, manual focus too w/split screen? And oh yes it has to be ugly* to keep forum chat strong!

* Like how I worked the K-s1 theme back into our thread? Was that wrong?

well I did mention Full Frame, so I hoped to spend 60 pages on that new topic.
09-04-2014, 05:52 AM - 1 Like   #1454
Site Supporter
Aristophanes's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,790
QuoteOriginally posted by IchabodCrane Quote
Notice that the two least camera-centric companies making cameras (Samsung, Sony) are the two that are further along with some of the ideas floated here in the past couple of pages.
You mean the lest optics-centric companies. Both have been making cameras for a long, long time.

There is no doubt the Japanese companies in particular (Sony is the most American of them) are caught in a "not invented here" rut of their own making, and Ricoh/Pentax with strong ties to only the domestic market is probably in a rut of a rut.

Even with video. The DSLR and the smartphone (both) started to destroy dedicated videocam sales. Add in GoPro and you have the perfect storm. But do Pentax, Fuji, and even Nikon beef up their systems to be major players? Not really. Fuji is video awful and I have been told firsthand that that impedes sales. They are soooo reluctant to tread on the videocam turf even if it is there for the taking. The Ricoh GR with an astounding WA lens should have been amped for video. I believe one reason why mirrorless sales have not been as much of a force as it was predicted was the very mediocre video offerings. Smartphones ate the mirrorless video lunch. The engineer and marketing firms in these companies are stuck in their Bento boxes.

The KS-1 adds a dedicated,l prominent video switch this time but no articulated screen. Frustrating to watch half-measures. Since the K-30 on the Pentax video and Live View has been really good (and LV focus speed has been excellent). But it is difficult to hold and track with a fixed screen. They are so close to true all-purpose products with superior retro functionality via k-mount. Pentax cameras have IBIS video stabilization for Pete's sake!

Video and wireless are holding things back IMO. And all of it needs to tie in strongly to mobile OS's much, much, much better.
09-04-2014, 07:01 AM   #1455
JPT
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tokyo
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,186
Original Poster
Special site for the K-S1. By clicking the links on the right, you can see the different colour variations from some different angles and with different lenses.

PENTAX K-S1 ???????????RICOH IMAGING

I really think they should have made the rubber of the HDMI flap match the body colour.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
af, camera, care, colour, design, ff, flash, format, iso, k-01, k-3, k3, kit, kit lens, leds, lens, level, look, medium, pentax, pentax k-s1, pentax news, pentax rumors, performance, price, scheme, steve, value
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some Thoughts on the K-01 and Mirrorless From Pentax Biro Pentax Mirrorless Cameras 108 06-25-2014 03:20 PM
Mirrorless K-Mount Camera Joshua A Photographic Industry and Professionals 12 08-22-2013 04:28 AM
K-mount mirrorless....FF RonHendriks1966 Pentax Full Frame 13 05-28-2013 03:13 PM
Waiting on my first mirrorless: K-01! Penta Welcomes and Introductions 2 01-30-2013 05:49 AM
New Pentax: K-5, K-r and Mirrorless models coming JohnBee Pentax News and Rumors 32 08-08-2010 01:57 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top