Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-16-2014, 07:16 AM   #181
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,801
QuoteOriginally posted by johnmflores Quote
into some kind of indictment that Ricoh is inept, abandoning the enthusiast camera segment, is not keeping up with the Fujis, and is, ultimately, doomed.
Not keeping up is pretty accurate. Fuji is a company that didn't even have a ILC body for 5 years. They launch a new mount, 4 bodies, and a dozen lenses faster than Pentax can get a 1.4x teleconverter out the door. They are doing a better job of marketing. It appears they are investing heavily into R&D. Fuji actually showed up with prototypes to show people. Pentax showed up with place cards "Coming Soon".

09-16-2014, 07:29 AM   #182
Pentaxian
johnmflores's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Somerville, NJ
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,185
QuoteOriginally posted by Winder Quote
Not keeping up is pretty accurate. Fuji is a company that didn't even have a ILC body for 5 years. They launch a new mount, 4 bodies, and a dozen lenses faster than Pentax can get a 1.4x teleconverter out the door. They are doing a better job of marketing. It appears they are investing heavily into R&D. Fuji actually showed up with prototypes to show people. Pentax showed up with place cards "Coming Soon".
In the game as cameras as sport, yes. In the game of "I need tools to take photographs", Pentax has served me well, and where there are gaps I have filled them with other brands.
09-16-2014, 08:11 AM - 2 Likes   #183
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 440
One thing I'd like to know is WTF are the people at Ricoh/Pentax actually working on? It almost seems that the products they put out are some sort of an afterthought. Endless make-overs of the same platform, re-badged zero investment models, no new lenses (well they are UNDER ENGINEERING). Then when the product hits the shelves it's already either basically absolete or middle of the road bland me too. I think it's fair for us to ask these questions, because it's been clear for several years that Ricoh is most definitely not innovating, nor even keeping up with competition. For instance we are now seeing the first wave of 4K cams, and it will probably take Ricoh another 2 or 3 years before we see it in a Pentax brand camera. What Ricoh does instead is provide some dazzling colors and LEDs to look at or some other dubious gimmick "feature". Ricoh is a huge company with deep pockets, so why are they not investing in Pentax? No amount of apologists can obscure the fact that they have had more than enough time to put out some real product. Meanwhile they are not even either able or willing to update/fix the technology they already have! Are they trying to drive away all the (remaining) "enthusiasts"? Maybe this is part of their strategy .. to shed the "legacy" users so they can then market fisher price-like cams in drugstores and supermarkets with wild abandon? Totally pathetic Photokina show FAIL on the part of Ricoh!!
09-16-2014, 08:22 AM   #184
Pentaxian
Raffwal's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 6457' North
Posts: 806
QuoteOriginally posted by digital029art Quote
One thing I'd like to know is WTF are the people at Ricoh/Pentax actually working on? It almost seems that the products they put out are some sort of an afterthought. Endless make-overs of the same platform, re-badged zero investment models, no new lenses (well they are UNDER ENGINEERING)... Ricoh is a huge company with deep pockets, so why are they not investing in Pentax?
Yes, it is becoming quite clear that they are not investing much in photography business. And considering the current state of the market, it is understandable that they are focusing on something else. Some camera and lens manufacturers are obviously willing to take the risk and invest and some of them will make a profit and others not. Ricoh does not seem to like risks.

09-16-2014, 11:23 AM   #185
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,122
QuoteOriginally posted by digital029art Quote
One thing I'd like to know is WTF are the people at Ricoh/Pentax actually working on? It almost seems that the products they put out are some sort of an afterthought. Endless make-overs of the same platform, re-badged zero investment models, no new lenses (well they are UNDER ENGINEERING)....
That is a valid question. I think the same stuff as their competition. But they have to scratch their projects a lot because the competition keeps getting there first?
09-16-2014, 11:44 AM   #186
Pentaxian
dcshooter's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Washington DC
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,605
That makes absolutely no sense. Are you saying that there is only room in the marketplace for one product at each segment?

QuoteOriginally posted by Clavius Quote
That is a valid question. I think the same stuff as their competition. But they have to scratch their projects a lot because the competition keeps getting there first?
09-16-2014, 12:15 PM   #187
Pentaxian
Clavius's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: De Klundert
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,122
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
That makes absolutely no sense. Are you saying that there is only room in the marketplace for one product at each segment?
No, I did not say that.

There is little space for niche products like, for example, FF mirrorless or super sensitive low MP FF. And Pentax representatives stated repeatedly to want to fill the niches in the market. And there I think the other brands kept beating them in speed time and time again. But that's just a wild theory of mine. Either something like that or Pentax just doesn't give a rats *&^%.
09-16-2014, 12:20 PM   #188
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,337
QuoteOriginally posted by Raffwal Quote
Yes, it is becoming quite clear that they are not investing much in photography business. And considering the current state of the market, it is understandable that they are focusing on something else. Some camera and lens manufacturers are obviously willing to take the risk and invest and some of them will make a profit and others not. Ricoh does not seem to like risks.
They invested IIRC about 42 million USD only in increasing production capacity (i.e. not counting R&D). Sure, that's nothing. The K-3 is nothing. The 645Z is nothing. The (supposedly) incoming FF and lenses are nothing.

09-16-2014, 12:33 PM   #189
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 703
QuoteOriginally posted by Kunzite Quote
They invested IIRC about 42 million USD only in increasing production capacity (i.e. not counting R&D). Sure, that's nothing. The K-3 is nothing. The 645Z is nothing. The (supposedly) incoming FF and lenses are nothing.
Is there any way for use to know exactly what products are clearly the result of Ricoh ideation, development and production and what products started with Hoya?
09-16-2014, 12:56 PM   #190
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,337
Does it matter? The Q was an untraditional product, and it was made under Hoya. The K-01, interesting design - same for the K-S1 (Hoya, Ricoh). Who knows how long ago they started working on the 70-200?
09-16-2014, 01:01 PM - 1 Like   #191
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 20,434
Might as well scornfully ask how many of these products were started under Pentax Corporation or Asahi Pentax.
09-16-2014, 01:09 PM   #192
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 703
QuoteOriginally posted by Kunzite Quote
Does it matter? The Q was an untraditional product, and it was made under Hoya. The K-01, interesting design - same for the K-S1 (Hoya, Ricoh). Who knows how long ago they started working on the 70-200?
It matters, companies that are risk averse don't invent, they follow other companies who invent , invest and take risk. Those companies tend to stay in business. To me it seems like Ricoh really isn't interested in photography only in finding easy ways to make a few bucks. If most of their great product offerings came from earlier companies then the long view isn't good for Pentax. On the other hand if Ricoh is totally responsible for the new 645Z then that's a very good sign.
09-16-2014, 01:11 PM   #193
Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Liverpool, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 12,872
QuoteOriginally posted by JPT Quote
I don't see how you can accuse Ricoh of elitism for making the 645z and then commend Leica. I don't think DPR users are really the target for the 645z anyway. They don't even have a medium format forum, do they?
The last time I paid any attention to DPReview was when I was researching bridge cameras.
09-16-2014, 01:12 PM   #194
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 703
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Might as well scornfully ask how many of these products were started under Pentax Corporation or Asahi Pentax.
Ha! I thought about that but didn't say it.... I do have hope for Pentax with Ricoh but I wish they communicated with their true believers and especially with some of the fantastic Pentax photographers that Ricoh should be giving free gear, apparel, and visibility. Would be cheap advertising for the brand.
09-16-2014, 01:37 PM   #195
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 20,434
QuoteOriginally posted by woodywesty Quote
Ha! I thought about that but didn't say it.... I do have hope for Pentax with Ricoh but I wish they communicated with their true believers and especially with some of the fantastic Pentax photographers that Ricoh should be giving free gear, apparel, and visibility. Would be cheap advertising for the brand.
The really difficult thing to internalize here is the amount of Pentax human capital that was retained by Hoya or terminated (and now is retained by competitors). There was certainly a Pentax design team and a specific design ethic - that differed from Ricoh's - to the extent that building unity and then synergy might have been more challenging than expected. Some posters here will think about that and view current products in a context. Others will just sneer.

I believe you are a thinker.

P.S. - it has taken my company 5 years to have our 'legacy thinking' beaten out of us by our acquirer. Finally, everyone who is going to complain has been terminated; everyone who is going to leave has left; and we seem to be pulling our oars together at last.

It takes a long time.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
frame, k-mount, k-s1, pentax news, pentax rumors, photokina
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition Announced Adam Pentax News and Rumors 285 11-18-2014 01:46 AM
Photokina 2014 - FF Tesla Pentax Full Frame 797 11-14-2014 11:14 PM
for Pentax k-5 owners: low light autofocus, is it that bad ?? makhzanji Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 15 07-20-2013 09:31 AM
Pentax: Is it really that bad for moving objects? TimonW Pentax DSLR Discussion 132 04-10-2013 11:20 AM
Is it my imagination that Pentax K-x captures less detail than a K100d? aruk5 Pentax DSLR Discussion 25 01-18-2012 01:14 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top