Originally posted by jatrax Focal length is excellent. If it was constant f/4, and the high standard of IQ that would imply I think everyone at least some, would be happy. But f/3.5-5.6 implies a low end lens with no more than adequate IQ.
I think owners of the Nikon 16-85/3.5-5.6 would have a different opinion.
Originally posted by jatrax I don't need that, and that's why I personally am disappointed. Cannot speak for anyone else, but the 18-135 already gives you 85mm @ f/5.6 if you don't like the IQ beyond 85mm ignore it. So why another low end zoom with a focal length that is already covered?
From a practical point of view, I'd rather have a lens that does everything within its range very well, so that I can stop worrying about that and just take shots. Plus, from looking at the review, I think I wouldn't be too happy with the IQ beyond 70mm, or even lower, in some circumstances.
Originally posted by jatrax I do not see any place for this in the line up except as a replacement for the 18-55 kit lens on higher end bodies. As such I am sure it will be a good lens, and a good move on Ricoh's part as they do need a better kit lens especially for the k-3.
Well, then the lens may not be for you.