The Pentax 100/4 is 1:2 (half life-size) not 2:1, as I recall. This is an interesting idea, but to be honest how often do you need to go beyond 1:1? If you are doing so, odds are you have a setup with a tripod, lighting, etc. where it is not really going to trouble you to use bellows/extension tubes. It is also such a challenge correct for aberrations well at such wildly different magnifications. The Bokina did infinity to 1:2, with added optical adaptor to do 1:2-1:1 in order to correct the aberrations at all ranges to a high degree. As to the optical design, it is a double-gauss based designed (like, e.g., the Bokina). I look forward to seeing the results (though with a manufacturer like this, QC is perhaps as big a question as anything). Here's the optical design and the MTF (for 10 and 30 lp/mm), though it does not gives the magnification it is for (still looks very impressive). The question is how does the performace hold up all over its range (as well as how consistant will the QC be).