Originally posted by LFLee I know FF should be expensive. BUT! why would anyone (non pentax) consider using pentax body and glass when C and N already have a pretty long history and many generations of digital full frame dslr? (Especially used top glass fir those two are plenty as well). If they are priced like CaNikon, honestly, and Pentaxian who is thinking of moving into Full frame now realize they don't need to wait for Pentax. Since the entry price will be the roughly the same no matter what brand you choose (and likely cheaper if you choose CaNikon, as used bodies are plentiful). Since I will be spending the same amount of money, I rather buy dslr that is in their 2nd or 3rd generations than a new comer and first one from Pentax.
If the pricing is high like this, they might just push Pentaxian who are waiting for full frame finally realized they don't have to stick with Pentax, after all these years. ..
It really depends on what they produce. The K-3 in it's class is probably the best value for the money.
I looked at the Nikon full frames. I'm not interested in the D600/610, I want resolution. The D800/810 is a monster, huge lenses, huge body. Stunning IQ, but the package wouldn't work for me. I'm not familiar with the Canon, but there are aspects such as noise and not being quite as good with their sensors. There is a place in the market for Pentax, and if they are on the ball they will hit it with a compelling offering.
I would buy if they offer me something. We will see if they do.
Reading the 645z reviews, a phrase shows up from time to time that is striking. Luscious files. That is what is moving those expensive boxes in spite of the various shortcomings. Watch for something similar with their full frame offerings.
I actually like buying into a company that is trying to get into a market that is occupied. They have to do better than the incumbents. We will see if Pentax manages that.