Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-07-2015, 06:42 PM   #361
Senior Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Parallax's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Dakota
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 15,103
QuoteOriginally posted by NaClH2O Quote
I think he was being sarcastic......
I sure hope so.

02-07-2015, 07:28 PM   #362
Loyal Site Supporter
THoog's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,399
QuoteOriginally posted by Adam Quote
Well, it's great to see that there's at least one person on the site that's enjoying the K-S1! After having used it myself I would never pick it over the K-50 or even the K-500 due to the handling issues, but if the K-50 didn't exist (it will almost surely be discontinued soon), then the K-S1 would make more sense in the lineup IMO. The sensor in the K-S1 is pretty darn good for an entry-level camera and I can't complain about a best-in-class viewfinder, either

We don't censor content or delete negative feedback, but you can certainly add annoying users to your ignore list or use our ignore thread feature so that entire threads won't show up in your searches.
I think there are actually FIVE people enjoying the K-S1! (Sadly, I think I can name them off the top of my head.)

I have to wonder if the response to the K-S1 would have been very different if the FF and/or KS-2 had been leaked first. Perhaps it would have been more of a "Oh, entry level. Looks funny. Whatever." instead of "HOW DARE THEY???"

In Clothears' defense, he was spoofing MikeP's request for a filter to remove "Pentax Is Doomed" from threads. He took it a little further, tho'. Okay, a lot further.
02-07-2015, 07:28 PM   #363
Imp
Pentaxian
Imp's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,312
QuoteOriginally posted by luftfluss Quote
Is the Canon T6i weather-sealed?
true, I didn't think of that... but then maybe they could increase the camera size a tad? There must be SOME way to create better thumb space
02-07-2015, 07:44 PM   #364
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,609
QuoteOriginally posted by Imp Quote
true, I didn't think of that... but then maybe they could increase the camera size a tad? There must be SOME way to create better thumb space
Also, hasn't anyone seen that new Dell laptop with a super slim bezel? And their tablet with a super slim bezel? Those displays are made by Sharp. Sharp also released a phone with virtually no bezel at all, and they have screens that can have any shape you'd want (as long as it's flat). What exactly requires such a thick bezel on cameras? And why is Samsung the (AFAIK) only one using OLED displays on a camera? They are tougher, offer more contrast, better viewing angles, lower power consumption, more saturation, thinner, ...

02-07-2015, 08:15 PM   #365
Site Supporter
Zygonyx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ile de France
Posts: 2,951
QuoteOriginally posted by THoog Quote
I think there are actually FIVE people enjoying the K-S1! (Sadly, I think I can name them off the top of my head.)

I have to wonder if the response to the K-S1 would have been very different if the FF and/or KS-2 had been leaked first. Perhaps it would have been more of a "Oh, entry level. Looks funny. Whatever." instead of "HOW DARE THEY???"

In Clothears' defense, he was spoofing MikeP's request for a filter to remove "Pentax Is Doomed" from threads. He took it a little further, tho'. Okay, a lot further.
Add me as number 6 please.
The K-S2 looks fine also, but has definitely NOT the same advantageous look or compacity...
02-07-2015, 08:19 PM   #366
JPT
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tokyo
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,185
When you think about the type of screen hinge that's being used here, the frame has t take a lot of stress. To use it, you unfold it and then twist it up or down by the frame, which risks flexing the screen. I think that's why the frame needs to be so thick in this kind of design.

It's interesting that camera companies have been more conservative than phone companies with LCD screens. I have a Sharp phone with an IGZO screen. It's a fantastic smartphone screen, because it is bright and uses so little power that the phone will run for 2-3 days of normal use between charges. But the colour accuracy is atrocious and I would hate to have it on a camera. The last time I looked at a Samsung phone with a OLED display, I felt the colours looked really off as well. I can only imagine the ones they use on their cameras are different, but they don't sell them in Japan. In any case, I think camera companies might be sticking with the technology they feel gives the most faithful colour reproduction. Or that they think the cost benefit of changing doesn't add up for customers.
02-07-2015, 08:20 PM   #367
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NJ
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,705
QuoteOriginally posted by Zygonyx Quote
Add me as number 6 please.
The K-S2 looks fine also, but has definitely NOT the same advantageous look or compacity...
"You are Number Six."
02-07-2015, 08:26 PM   #368
Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,724
QuoteOriginally posted by Zygonyx Quote
Add me as number 6 please.
The K-S2 looks fine also, but has definitely NOT the same advantageous look or compacity...
Could you elaborate on this (I'm trying to decide which K-xx I want to purchase)
What do you think the K-S1 does/has that the K-S2 fails to meet??

02-07-2015, 09:11 PM   #369
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Photos: Albums
Posts: 613
I would enjoy the K-S1 if I didn't own any weather resistant lenses and got it new for, say, $300 or less... but for $600... I will just stick with my K30!
02-07-2015, 09:18 PM   #370
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,609
QuoteOriginally posted by JPT Quote
When you think about the type of screen hinge that's being used here, the frame has t take a lot of stress. To use it, you unfold it and then twist it up or down by the frame, which risks flexing the screen. I think that's why the frame needs to be so thick in this kind of design.

It's interesting that camera companies have been more conservative than phone companies with LCD screens. I have a Sharp phone with an IGZO screen. It's a fantastic smartphone screen, because it is bright and uses so little power that the phone will run for 2-3 days of normal use between charges. But the colour accuracy is atrocious and I would hate to have it on a camera. The last time I looked at a Samsung phone with a OLED display, I felt the colours looked really off as well. I can only imagine the ones they use on their cameras are different, but they don't sell them in Japan. In any case, I think camera companies might be sticking with the technology they feel gives the most faithful colour reproduction. Or that they think the cost benefit of changing doesn't add up for customers.
Fair enough, but I have seen a Lenovo Thinkpad being held by the corner of the screen (the whole laptop can be flat). The laptop was being held flat, i.e. the opposite corner would be at the same height. And it hardly flexed. It must be possible to produce a small screen that is robust enough...


Colour accuracy... you can calibrate that. Samsung is going for the most catching image they can produce, but I'm sure subtle is possible too. IIRC there was/is an OLED Sony video monitor, to be used by professionals.
02-07-2015, 09:41 PM   #371
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 465
QuoteOriginally posted by Clothears Quote
BTW Adam, ... any chance you can auto-delete posts by people who sneer at the K-S1. Such posts were mildly amusing the first time but now they're just bloody annoying and only used by those who have nothing of interest to say. If you can manage to auto-cancel their accounts too that would be just extra special.
Good luck with that. I think Adam is chief cheerleader of the K-S1 sneerers.
02-07-2015, 09:56 PM   #372
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nelson B.C.
Posts: 3,211
QuoteOriginally posted by JPT Quote
When you think about the type of screen hinge that's being used here, the frame has t take a lot of stress. To use it, you unfold it and then twist it up or down by the frame, which risks flexing the screen. I think that's why the frame needs to be so thick in this kind of design.

It's interesting that camera companies have been more conservative than phone companies with LCD screens. I have a Sharp phone with an IGZO screen. It's a fantastic smartphone screen, because it is bright and uses so little power that the phone will run for 2-3 days of normal use between charges. But the colour accuracy is atrocious and I would hate to have it on a camera. The last time I looked at a Samsung phone with a OLED display, I felt the colours looked really off as well. I can only imagine the ones they use on their cameras are different, but they don't sell them in Japan. In any case, I think camera companies might be sticking with the technology they feel gives the most faithful colour reproduction. Or that they think the cost benefit of changing doesn't add up for customers.
Phones are replaced every year or two. Durability isn't a concern. I hope their way of doing things doesn't infect DSLR manufacturers.
02-08-2015, 12:28 AM   #373
Site Supporter
Zygonyx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ile de France
Posts: 2,951
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
Could you elaborate on this (I'm trying to decide which K-xx I want to purchase)
What do you think the K-S1 does/has that the K-S2 fails to meet??
As far as look is concerned : the K-S1 is really smart and different - take a look at the white version for example.
The rear luminous mode wheel is very practical when having to use it for concert or night photography / tripod. + that wheel it is a real plus for any LiveView user.
As a matter of compacity : i have a small Lowepro camera bag in which only the K-S1 or K-01 can lodge.
The K-S2 will not match those yet "urban use" standards and will not feet in that small bag.

re. price : thanks to Amazon firesales and the 50 refund, i paid 480 Euros for the two kits i bought (one for my daughter +18-55 , one for me +35mm)

Last edited by Zygonyx; 02-08-2015 at 12:39 AM.
02-08-2015, 12:36 AM   #374
Site Supporter
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: 1hr north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,480
K-s1 bodies are just under $450 now on this side. Perhaps another $100 lower and I can manage one, assuming no more budget surprises for a while.
02-08-2015, 12:49 AM   #375
mee
Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,253
QuoteOriginally posted by derekkite Quote
Phones are replaced every year or two. Durability isn't a concern. I hope their way of doing things doesn't infect DSLR manufacturers.
Durability isn't a concern in any consumer market today. It is all about looking good at the cash register / checkout. People like to buy new shiny so it only benefits manufacturers to purposely not consider durability in an effort to cut costs in order to offer it in Walmart for dirt cheap. What an era in which we live.

Knowing camera shutters tend to be rated at 100,000 (at least) actuations, I thought it would be interesting if DSLR bodies were upgradeable through plug and play installable cpus and pay-for firmware upgrades that would enhance the feature set long term. upgrade from 6 to 12 FPS with double buffer size. Upgrade to the video package.. modular card slot that could be upgraded to dual CF or dual SD or 1 SD and 1 CF. Just customizations and improvements that would keep the camera's featureset fairly current while continually using the core of the camera body.

Minus the R&D, support, and general overhead of such a complex system, I think though just by thinking about this now, most/all manufacturers would take the Canon approach and purposefully gut the feature set then offer what would have normally been there from the get-go for an extra fee (or, in Canon's case, offer eleventy million camera bodies).
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
ambassador, bit, camera, excitement, ff, forums, future, grip, k-3, k-s1, ken, legacy, lot, pentax, pentax brand, pentax news, pentax rumors, pm, post, ricoh, screen, sensor, source, space, time, touch, wi-fi, wifi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K-3 Camera Icon type is coming up wrong in Flickr Exif! dcpropilot Pentax K-3 2 12-20-2014 09:16 PM
That expensive case is coming with the K-01 chucuyuco Pentax K-01 5 03-10-2013 08:07 AM
Nature Spring is Coming Den Post Your Photos! 2 02-26-2013 08:41 AM
Is there anything coming to replace the K-5 KLSMpls Pentax K-5 18 03-28-2011 05:26 PM
My Lent is over--new K-x is coming Ira Pentax DSLR Discussion 17 08-03-2010 11:22 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top