Originally posted by Adam
Pentax should have skipped the K-S1 and just launched this instead.
The new naming convention makes sense, though.
It may also be a hint that we
will see something like K-2, K-F2, K-L2, or a similar name on a new FF.
---------- Post added 02-05-15 at 11:08 PM ----------
Look how DSLR cameras are becoming -
very tied in to the legacy. People have decided they like a conventional grip, which originally was almost created by accident - or at least had as much to do with the need to put a roll of film in there as anything else. To retain such a grip they have to put something in the large space of the grip - so they stuff a battery in there. Then they have to leave some space between the grip and the lens so one can get his fingers in there to hold it - thus making the camera wider. And they need to have a great amount of thickness front-to-back in order to maintain the registration distance for the lenses, as well as giving the mirror space to move within. On the left side virtually nothing's left, because no legacy requirement forces them to even
have a "left side!"
It's no wonder mirrorless ILCs have become prevalent in the market. I think they should design a smaller, mirror-like part that doesn't have to flip and take up so much volume or front-to-back space.