Originally posted by ZeljkoS This is not a top level camera, why would Pentax do that? Who would buy the K-3 then
The Idea is, try to compete mid-range dslr with a good number. Prosumers care about how many pixel, how many AF points, how is the FPS, and etc. Look at D5500, or the new EOS T6i, or Sony A6000.
Amid the tough competition, Pentax can't play conservative like this. Still offering technology that has been used 3 years ago. Of course K-3 still hold the advantage in the buffer size, build quality, FPS, and many more. And by the time K-3 need replacement, there should be better tech and innovation like better AF, sensor shift, etc.
It looks to me K-S2 is what K-S1 should be, and that is pity.