Originally posted by Zygonyx APS-C DSLR right, but Fuji X-T1 or Olympus E-M1 don't have internal flash either.
But : externat flash is always provided with X-T1 body for example.
Doing so with K-3II and adding only 100 bucks to the invoice would be an appropriate marketing arrangement....
Removing the flash is a big change. It is obvious, and on it's own for many a non starter. So obvious, such a cheap little accessory already designed and implemented, why not put it there?
So I ask, why not put it there?
1.The space is required for something else that we don't know about, that is far more valuable for users than a flash.
a. The GPS. They are tiny modules, probably small enough to fit in the same space as the button. Doesn't make sense.
b. A new viewfinder technology? That would take room.
c. A new and different focus/metering/mirror technology implementation.
2. The flash itself it of very limited use, what I use it for is a trigger for remote flashes. Pentax is going to introduce a seriously revamped flash system.
3. Pentax is differentiating their target market. Serious amateurs and pros, assuming the triggering functionality is there, don't use the internal flash and have other hardware. So they are moving the aps-c upmarket a bit. I may be wrong, but I see no reason why the K-3 which they can sell profitably for $800 with an improved firmware taking better advantage of the existing hardware cannot be maintained in production as a high midrange aps-c model.
4. Ricoh has lost their mind.
I don't discount #4. Pentax is Doooomed!!!