Originally posted by Black_Wizards Ok thanks.
Because we literally use Lightroom and other program for "demosaicing" a DNG file which means "interpolate" existing informations to create the one missing in the file since we don't have all the R G B vlaue in a normal DNG file. So, with a file containing ever value, there is no point in demosaicing it so program like Lighroom are useless and that explain why Sigma never find a solution for their file but only their own program... So yes I'm very curious to see how Ricoh succeed where Sigma fails...
Could be more of a "can't be bothered" thing rather than not being able to do it. It costs Adobe time and money to figure out the Sigma files, and who owns a Sigma camera?! Of course this is going to be a bit of an issue for Pentax too, cause the number of cameras that can produce these files isn't going to be small.
Raw files are IIRC usually greyscale TIFF images, and Lightroom knows which pixel should have which color and then interpolates what pixel should have what color. DNG files are basically such greyscale TIFF files in a certain container (defined by Adobe) and compressed with a certain compression algorithm (actually only the decoding is defined I'd guess, how you implement the encoder is up to Pentax, Adobe, ... that's why a DNG file from a K-5 can be compressed lossless in Lightroom and ends up smaller). DNG AFAIK does support full color TIFF data that doesn't have to be demosaiced, it will be bigger (obviously), but that's it. Hopefully it's not hard to implement for Pentax, they would just have to add up the 4 photos taken... I think? Then pack that in a DNG container and Lightroom hopefully reads it. I'd be surprised if Pentax didn't do that.
You can look at the K-30 and K-5 internals here:
Pentax K-30 vs K-5 IIs Cross Sections - Photokina 2012 | PentaxForums.com
I suppose the K-3 will be similar to the K-5...? The chips in the OGPS-1 might fit in there...? With some effort? But the problem is that part of the body is metal... not good for the antenna. Maybe if they had placed the antenna in an extended flash enclosure made out of plastic? If Pentax were to design a camera with GPS from the ground up I would expect them to be able to fit GPS _and_ a flash. But this is different. And maybe they are also hoping to see how people will react to the loss of a flash... if the reaction isn't too bad, maybe they have other plans for that space (Hybrid viewfinder? Please Pentax?). Otherwise, this is just a temporary filler, and the successor will have a flash.
---------- Post added 24-04-15 at 01:45 ----------
Originally posted by Steve.Ledger Which DSLR model has GPS/WiFi/NFC ?
NFC doesn't have to be at the top of the camera, it can be placed like in the K-S2. And the D5300 has GPS and WiFi. Yes, no metal body, but with a new body Pentax might have a part of it (near the hotshoe?) made from plastic, so they can fit antennas there? I'm not an electrical engineer (though I was heading in that direction, once... but didn't get too far... all that math...). Not being able to change anything apart from the flash housing itself must have limited them quite a bit.