Originally posted by neostyles Trust me, they really help with photography. 60 years ago, there was no such thing as liveview but this has helped me so much. 60 years ago there was no such thing as digital post processing (and if what i learned in my film photography classes was any sign it was pretty limited by today's standards) but these things have changed the face of photography forever. 60 years ago if you want to get shot that was taller than you, you would probably have to get something to stand on or something, but articulating touch screens help you to get shots from much higher vantage points. I often hear that pentax's marketing is to blame for their brand being a niche one, but i doubt that this is the case. We live in the age of social media and the information age and all the big names are making it easier to get yourself out there via social media channels. Video is huge today. It provides a powerful platform to communicate ideas. There is a reason why Youtube has billions of hits every month. The consumer market for video has really grown in the last two years, yet pentax doesn't seem to be all that concerned with video.
Is an aa simulator a photography "basic"? What about blinking lights? Point is that they are cherry picking what constitutes remain "true" to photography and the result is something that neither feels up to date or like the nod to their illustrious past. Thats why i ultimately chose to step away from pentax.
Interesting.
We've seen the photos you take and honestly, it isn't the camera holding you back. When you get your Samsung NX or, when that doesn't work out, when you get a Sony A7r, I'm afraid you will still be where you are at right now. Photography is really a lot more than the sum of the specs. Frame rates and menu systems and even fun little filters that camera companies choose to throw under the hood don't tell you what kind of results you are going to get...
(taken with a crappy, cheap K-01 camera and DA 15 lens).
Last edited by Rondec; 04-23-2015 at 03:29 PM.