Originally posted by D1N0 I think the VC makes them too big. Especially compared to the 43mm F1.9 ltd.
You may have heard something else, but the girls like BIG lenses... ;P Joking aside:
I like the idea of having also VC built into lenses even for Pentax mount. I loved my Sigma 150-500mm OS. It played all so well with the K-3s built in SR.... It worked like a charm.
I would really love to get that 150-600mm Tamron lens WITH built in VC.... :P (that would be deeelicious...)
AND I would also love to see a 85mm 1.4 or 1.2 Di from Tamron.
---------- Post added 09-02-15 at 05:47 AM ----------
Originally posted by Simen1 ... because it would compete against the much cheaper DA35/2,4 and DA50/1,8 and most likely D-FA variants.
I see your point, but it don't see these lenses competing with each other... 1.8 (if it is good) is another league than 2.4 but if it aint has a weather sealing, the 45mm Tammy may not stand a chance against pentaXes DA 50 1.8 since this DA also works as a FF lens. But many people could consider a buy just because of the silent AF... I am also thinking all the time about getting rid of my DA 18-55mm WR and buy a DA 18-50mm WR DC instead.
But since i can't effort to blow my money out of the window i'll not buy and exchange lenses only because i like one feature. At least until i make money with my photography.
But many people live a different life... I guess there could be a lot of customers interested in those lenses.