[D1N0]

K-1 and 70-200 are in full production run,the target is end of January for the 2.8 70-200.
Than we should get the first shipping.
The K-1 is the Big Pentax Showevent at the Yokohama CP+.
First shipping target could be end of march.
That´s how the Meeting ends today.
If i get any upgrade information,i will be here again.
Best regards and good night.

Looks like they moved the release date to the release date of the K-1 (end of march, April 1......)

[D1N0]

New update from asahiman:

Sorry,new lens Body.
Or lens housing.
Most of the test users had a Problem with the tripod Mount,it is to Close to the camerabody.
I had a Problem to hold it longer time with different cameras,cause my fingers are to Close at the collar.
It was the only negative Point after month ot lens testing.
The optical Formular seems to be very good.
Best regards

---------- Post added 17-12-15 at 19:42 ----------

Looking at this pic:


There may be to little space between the grip and the back of the lens body.

[biz-engineer]

What's up with the green ring though?

The green makes it invisible for landscape. The red? When I was a kid, I convinced myself that a red bike was faster, and it worked !

---------- Post added 17-12-15 at 22:34 ----------

Looking at this pic:

How is that possible that the tripod mount is a problem? When a tripod is use, the lens is not held by hand , I suppose. When used without tripod, the tripod mount is removed, so what's the problem ?

[rawr]

When used without tripod, the tripod mount is removed, so what's the problem ?

I have been puzzled by that issue too. Seems like some people handle such lenses in peculiar ways, holding the lens right at it's base, and trying to squeeze their hands in between the tripod shoe and the lens body ??

I'd like to see some side-by-side images of a Canon, Nikon, Sigma, Tamron 70-200's tripod foot and the rear of the lens body, and the Pentax 70-200. There can't be that much difference between the dimensions of all of those lenses.

When I shoot 70-200's, 95% of the time it's with a monopod attached anyhow. The gap between the tripod shoe and the lens body is not an issue.

My main gripe with the delay is that they should have simply said a year ago: 'The 70-200 will be released the same time as the FF is released'. End of story.

The intermittent dribble of information, and variable release dates, hasn't been helpful to anyone.

[biz-engineer]

When I shoot 70-200's, 95% of the time it's with a monopod attached anyhow. The gap between the tripod shoe and the lens body is not an issue.

yes, and if you look at the Tamron 70-200 VC, its tripod collar is also very close to the lens mount side. The way I understand it now is that the lens mount is going to be moved at the same place as it is on the Tamron 70-200 VC :-) :-)

[Uluru]

I never explored Pentax 70-210 prototype image in detail, I saw only scarce small pictures, and I remember it looked a bit strange on the camera... but now it is shockingly obvious.
Say, design of the Nikon's 70-210/2.8 is different. Enough space is allowed for fingers to grab around the grip by thinning of the lens barrel on that part, and that is why the tripod collar is pushed forward. But look at Pentax design! The collar and lens barrel in full width is practically glued onto the mount. Only toddlers can use this lens comfortably.
Considering that Pentax cameras tend to be smaller and more compact anyway, I wonder what on earth those lens designers had in mind?!
Too much time off the FF market, and there you go ...

Pentax:


Nikon:

[monochrome]

How is that possible that the tripod mount is a problem? When a tripod is use, the lens is not held by hand , I suppose. When used without tripod, the tripod mount is removed, so what's the problem ?

When you shoot in Portrait mode on the tripod with the grip of the camera DOWN rather than up* the tripod mount pinches the fingers against the grip, making it uncomfortable to shoot - or impossible when wearing gloves. The distance between the shoulder of the mount and the camera body / grip is too close to the body. This will necessitate redesigning the body of the lens to move the tripod ring farther forward.

I know - I always shoot portrait orientation with the grip-up, but enough testers complained that apparently Ricoh has decided to pull the lens and perform a minor redesign of the mount ring placement.


* attach lens tripod mount to tripod head, rotate camera clockwise so grip is down, not counter-clockwise so grip is up.

---

Last edited by monochrome; 12-17-2015 at 03:31 PM.

[Qwntm]

All the DA* lenses have a green ring ring at the mount and a gold band at the other end. I guess they are continuing that with the DFA* series.

OK, that makes sense. Thanks.

[totsmuyco]

This lens looks big and heavy.

[RonHendriks1966]

I never explored Pentax 70-210 prototype image in detail, I saw only scarce small pictures, and I remember it looked a bit strange on the camera... but now it is shockingly obvious.
Say, design of the Nikon's 70-210/2.8 is different. Enough space is allowed for fingers to grab around the grip by thinning of the lens barrel on that part, and that is why the tripod collar is pushed forward. But look at Pentax design! The collar and lens barrel in full width is practically glued onto the mount. Only toddlers can use this lens comfortably.
Considering that Pentax cameras tend to be smaller and more compact anyway, I wonder what on earth those lens designers had in mind?!
Too much time off the FF market, and there you go ...

Pentax:


Nikon:

Some how it doesn't look that different then thè da*60-250mm lens to me.

[D1N0]

They just have to solve it like they did with the 150-450

[monochrome]

They just have to solve it like they did with the 150-450

There's a balance issue.

[D1N0]

There's a balance issue.

There isn't on de 150-450 apparently.

[rawr]

Pentax must have been aware of the foot placement issue for a long time. Pentax themselves even had the 70-200 on display alongside the Canon 70-200 at the last CP+, where the difference in foot placement is, in retrospect, clearer than I remembered it to be:

They just have to solve it like they did with the 150-450

True. The foot looks identical between the 70-200 and 150-450 too. Must be the new standard-issue Pentax telephoto lens foot.

[jatrax]

Sorry,new lens Body. Or lens housing. Most of the test users had a Problem with the tripod Mount,it is to Close to the camerabody. I had a Problem to hold it longer time with different cameras,cause my fingers are to Close at the collar. It was the only negative Point after month ot lens testing. The optical Formular seems to be very good.

This seems to me to be very, very good news for two reasons:
1) The optical design is good and the change is not due to that or to AF issues as was speculated.
2) Ricoh listened to the beta testers and made a major change to the lens because people complained.

I won't debate the tripod mount placement, this is not a lens I am ever likely to buy and I've no idea if the mount is right or wrong. But the fact they would stop and make a change this late tells me Ricoh wants this one right. That's a big plus for Ricoh I think.