Originally posted by Roberts Delay of review of k20d on DPR is because they found hot pixels issue and informed about that Pentax and waited for firmware. And now they posted preview befor finishing final review because many people waited for and wanted any information on Pentax k20d. The staff of DPR posted it on DPR PentaxSLR forum many times.
I am sorry but how this contradicts what I said? I know very well the official story and the fact that imaging-resource had the same issue. I don't claim this is not a problem but what I say is this "preview"could be done weeks and even months ago since it don't involve a single picture. And if they were interested in making Pentax come up with a solution (which the had eventually) how better to do this than to put a preview 6 weeks ago and say "we wait for a firmware fix to post any pictures"???
BTW some K20D pictures were in Alpha 350 review so the camera was there.
I have nothing against dpreview I only say they are a little biased and not at all interested in a rapid review of K20D.
Radu