Originally posted by iudex Maybe it is, but it´s not a mirrorless system someone takes seriously. Teenage Japanese girls like and buy it, but with it´s tiny sensor it competes with smartphones and not with other mirrorless cameras. And entering mirrorless segment (APSC, 4/3, FF) is a bit too late and for a small company like Ricoh also financially unbearable.
Do you have a Q?? My Mileage Definitely Varies from your comments!!
Several years ago my primary camera was a Canon Rebel. When it unexpectedly died, I had no viable secondary camera (my only other digital camera was a Canon Elph), so I quickly went out and, without taking time to do any analysis, bought another Rebel. Then, thirteen months ago, I bought a Q-7 to replace the Elph, and over the next six months it proved itself (I have posted here how it has given me better pictures, even in darkish situations, than a 5-year-old DSLR would, for example), so when the replacement Rebel died I used the Q as my secondary camera while I systematically looked for a Pentax DSLR in the same price range as a Rebel. Eventually I bought a K-30. The K-30 is clearly my primary camera, but even having it available, I take almost as many pictures with my Q-7. Regardless of conditions, if I display images from both on a computer screen (I don't make large prints nor do I examine images under high magnification), I cannot readily/reliably identify which images were taken with which camera.