Originally posted by thibs LOL, all those moaning about this lens aren't even concerned since they don't even own a digital 645.
Is this BS time or something?
I don't own a digital 645. I sold my 645z just before the price drop after investing in a dual 5DSr setup.
But I've shot Phase and Hasselblad digital as well as pretty much every pro Canon lens and body combo as well as the Sigma foveon, Olympus and Fuji offerings.
Despite selling my 645z I kept my 35FA, 55mm D-FA, 75mm and 150mm with a view to buy back in when ready (i.e. at the advent of an even larger sensor). My cause for concern is that there's been a few things recently that worry me about the direction Ricoh is going in. It seems like some things are done to be 'just good enough'. The Tamron FF 24-70 and it's pricing being one. The other this half job 35mm.
I don't understand what logical reason there would be behind only updating the coatings and sticking a bit of colour on it would achieve. Ricoh called it a new lens but it's not. It's a refresh. I'm certainly not a lens designer so I won't belittle the people who put this together but it makes no sense whatsoever to not update the weather sealing or the AF motor. 2 out of the 3 most integral parts of a lens.
I also complain a lot about the Sony A7's and their lack of dual card slots. So shoot me.
Maybe after Pentax being under financial stress for so long in the past has forced Ricoh to be strict with dev budgets. That would make sense but it doesn't translate well to the consumers who know anything about cameras.