Originally posted by mohb What he says about Nikon is not exactly complimentary
In this article, he is offering his sage advice to Nikon, and the suggestion to go mirrorless with the D3300 successor will gratify some here, though the proposal to keep the existing lens mount will no doubt cause some of those to choke on their corn flakes.
I notice that, in his dismissal of all Pentax DSLRs as being late to market, he pays no heed to the 645Z's success, but why spoil a good story with an inconvenient fact?
All in all, his deprecating review of all other makers tells me that he doesn't pay much close attention to anything but Nikon, which is fair enough in itself, but he shouldn't comment on other matters if he either doesn't want to spend the time on researching them, or willfully ignores what he does know.