Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-30-2015, 04:08 PM   #136
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,603
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
But the FF sensor is twice the size. An FF sensor collects twice as much light as an APS-c sensor at the same -stop, and shutter speed and ISO. Even shooting APS-c light intensity matters (look up reciprocity). I've noticed that at the same ISO an APS-c image will have more noise shot in low light at a longer shutter speed, than shot in bought light at a fast shutter speed. The light is more intense. Wen you normalize for DoF, you collect the same amount of light. 8 with a sensor double the size, 5.6 with a sensor half the size. Collect the same amount of light, and you have the same s/n ratio.
I still have some skepticism around this. My brain tells me that the primary driver here is the pixel size and sensor generation. Two sensors of the same generation with similar pixel sizes will perform the same. Typically APSC sensors have had smaller pixels than FF so this notion is accurate in that the collection sites are larger on the FF generally. Interpolation can of course make this better than that implies.

12-30-2015, 04:19 PM   #137
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
RobA_Oz's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,015
QuoteOriginally posted by UncleVanya Quote
I still have some skepticism around this. My brain tells me that the primary driver here is the pixel size and sensor generation. Two sensors of the same generation with similar pixel sizes will perform the same. Typically APSC sensors have had smaller pixels than FF so this notion is accurate in that the collection sites are larger on the FF generally. Interpolation can of course make this better than that implies.
With the same lens (not "equivalent FL") on an APS-C and a 35mm sensor, the illumination levels (ie light density or light energy per unit area) will be identical at the same f-stop setting. It's only when people start trying to deal with equivalence based on circles of confusion that things start getting confused (pun intended).
12-30-2015, 04:22 PM   #138
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,745
Should St. Thomas Aquinas miraculously be resurrected even he would not resolve this question.
12-30-2015, 04:36 PM   #139
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,603
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Should St. Thomas Aquinas miraculously be resurrected even he would not resolve this question.
That is likely true as it is unlikely he would be up on the latest technology...

12-30-2015, 05:09 PM   #140
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,745
QuoteOriginally posted by UncleVanya Quote
That is likely true as it is unlikely he would be up on the latest technology...
dude.

Angels. A Pin.
12-30-2015, 05:15 PM   #141
Pentaxian
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide.
Posts: 9,298
QuoteOriginally posted by RobA_Oz Quote
light density
Photons are massless - by definition, density is a property that only particles with mass posses.
12-30-2015, 05:44 PM   #142
Forum Member




Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
In physics terminology, there are definitions of densities that involve mass and there are those that do not (eg. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_%28disambiguation%29), but anyways the standard term of 'lux' is what was intended as the measure of illuminance on the sensor surface, I imagine.
12-30-2015, 06:11 PM   #143
Senior Member
screwdriver222's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Plymouth
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 136
Photons are massless but behave as waves and particles

12-30-2015, 07:21 PM   #144
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 274
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Should St. Thomas Aquinas miraculously be resurrected even he would not resolve this question.
453.4 small pixels can fit on the head of a pin. But you are better off if you limit the number to 300 larger pixels and use a new pin.
12-30-2015, 07:26 PM - 1 Like   #145
Pentaxian
Site Supporter
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 29,962
QuoteOriginally posted by indy Quote
453.4 small pixels can fit on the head of a pin. But you are better off if you limit the number to 300 larger pixels and use a new pin.
You mean a Full Head pin?
12-30-2015, 07:33 PM - 1 Like   #146
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
colonel00's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 479
So, 10 pages into this thread we find out it all comes down to pinheads...fantastic!
12-30-2015, 08:09 PM   #147
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 274
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
You mean a Full Head pin?
Yes...we must remain small and humble. To think or speak of 5x8 would be prideful. Only the engineer knows the answer to things greater than Full Head.
12-30-2015, 08:20 PM   #148
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,656
30.11.2015 = History of Pentax and FF
11.12.2015 = K-mount compatibility explained
24.12.2015 = Crop modes explained
05.01.2016 = ??????
12-30-2015, 08:31 PM - 2 Likes   #149
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 11,222
QuoteOriginally posted by bxf Quote
Nikon D810 and Pentax k-5 have very similar pixel pitch...
Thank you for making my point, Bxf.

They are very similar.

It's possible the 810 is just made from a bigger slice of the K-5 wafer.

Have a look at how close their noise performance is in on DXOMark - go to 'Measurements', 'SNR 18%', 'Screen'.

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D810-versus-Pentax...___963_914_830

Use the 'Screen' tab, not the 'Print' tab, since the latter only involves the software noise reduction when they downsample to their 8Mp reference. (This is simply due to the megapickle count. A K-3 benefits more from this than a FF A7S or Canon 1Dx.)

Sensor size does *not* affect noise performance, whatever you've read other people post in other threads, over many years, I bet.

Numbers and size of pixels, circuitry design and suppression of heat/stray currents do.

Last edited by clackers; 12-30-2015 at 08:37 PM.
12-30-2015, 10:16 PM - 1 Like   #150
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
RobA_Oz's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,015
QuoteOriginally posted by Digitalis Quote
Photons are massless - by definition, density is a property that only particles with mass posses.
Blame my physics lecturers at university. Density is a general term for a volumetric or area rate that only involves mass in its specific definition within mechanics.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
adventure, aps-c, buffer, camera, cameras, crop, crop mode, da lenses, dx, ff, ff sensors, frame, guys, image, images, k1 pics, lenses, light, mode, mp, pentax news, pentax rumors, post, range, sensor, sensors, shutter, sports
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which of the K1* bodies works best with M-lenses? gavinhw Pentax DSLR Discussion 15 02-27-2016 01:02 PM
D FA lens with full performance on new K1? Uncle Pete Pentax Full Frame 15 12-17-2015 05:25 AM
Difference in writing time between shooting with DA lenses and K lenses pirivirus Pentax K-5 6 04-08-2013 06:18 PM
News Two new smc Pentax-DA* lenses added to the Lens Review Database Update Ole Site Suggestions and Help 2 12-13-2008 09:25 PM
First Pics with New DA 50-200 CDP Post Your Photos! 4 05-21-2007 05:25 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:45 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top