I've been asked to settle down in the past - so now I'm asking. Everyone please settle down.
The poster who elicited kenspo's response joined 02/04/2016 and has 16 posts. No one knows how long the member has been lurking, but for him to suggest kenspo made and broke a promise is ludicrous, much less to suggest kenspo promised the best af ever.
Ricoh apparently believes, and we seem to recall they said
af is the most important element to work on, to expend extra effort to improve. It won't be completely, equally competitive, in all aspects, immediately, at the flagship level; it might never be the equal of a $6,000 sports / action camera; it will take some time for the lenses to catch up since many of them were built and inventoried quite some time ago.
Considerate, patient,
informed people understand and accept such facts.
Drive by shooters - well - drive by and shoot.
We can certainly expect significant, material advances with each new model,
significantly more than incremental improvement each time. I say such a thing because I pay attention to patents (there has been a flurry of af patents), I read here and other forums often and have for years, I use the cameras and I accept that my needs are not the same as a stringer for NFL Properties. Eye recognition, sure, I could use that. Predictive tracking algorithm, yeah, probably. 6.5 fps - yeah, I guess so. Fast in-lens motors to deliver the camera's calculations, yep, you betcha (don't forget the lenses are part of the deal). Those seem to be the things Ricoh is developing.
So please just exhale, wait a few days and evaluate what we get. What we're going to get for $2,200 will be quite remarkable, really.
Last edited by monochrome; 02-15-2016 at 06:05 AM.