Full K-1 Spec list

Enrique S Toso · 02-17-2016, 12:43 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by D1N0

1010 with battery

Yep, but REALLY all weather...not like "feel like a cheap toy" canikons (yeap, even the D810). Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail.

i5_david · 02-17-2016, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by Enrique S Toso

Yep, but REALLY all weather...not like "feel like a cheap toy" canikons (yeap, even the D810). Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail.

do you have the link to this test? sounds like hilarious fun... to bridge the time to the final revelation

**WillWeaverRVA** · 02-17-2016, 01:06 PM

Originally posted by Kenntak

I am naive about this, but how much of a difference would ISO 50 make?

Some people want the option of being able to take photos while facing an explosion.

Shanti · 02-17-2016, 01:07 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by OJGoreng

Local dealer already offers it for pre-order: Foto Booms | Pentax K1 body | Productinformatie
Price TBA, though.

Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet

D1N0 · 02-17-2016, 01:19 PM

Originally posted by Shanti

Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet

Booms Looman, all these Dutch names must look weird in English.

pathdoc · 02-17-2016, 01:20 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by Enrique S Toso

Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail.

You mean they duplicated what Heie did to his Pentax and they destroyed the Canon DSLR in the process? Oh God, yes, please, the link!!

kooks · 02-17-2016, 01:31 PM

Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

rawr · 02-17-2016, 01:50 PM

Originally posted by kooks

Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

No-one but Ricoh engineers can really answer that. Someone should ask them at CP+.

It seems dumb to me. They had it in K-3, everything was working fine.

ogl · 02-17-2016, 01:55 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by kooks

Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

Prepare USB3.0 and some new features for K-1II in 1,5 year.

---------- Post added 02-17-2016 at 01:56 PM ----------

Originally posted by kooks

Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

Honestly - I used USB with my Pentax cameras several times from 2005. It seems to me 3-4 times.

**beachgardener** · 02-17-2016, 02:00 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by kooks

Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

maybe they think wireless tethering is the go, and beyond that who uses the usb port?

however I agree, if a usb port is included it should be usb3.

RonHendriks1966 · 02-17-2016, 02:03 PM

Originally posted by Shanti

Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet

Ah you are one of the pre-orders. I was in the store on februari 6th. Nice people, visits them not that often since I live in The South of The Netherlands.

Zygonyx · 02-17-2016, 02:03 PM

Originally posted by beachgardener

maybe they think wireless tethering is the go, and beyond that who uses the usb port?

Yes, i think they hesitated to just throw it away like Apple, but they only downscaled it this time.

zmohie · 02-17-2016, 02:04 PM

Originally posted by rawr

No-one but Ricoh engineers can really answer that. Someone should ask them at CP+.

It seems dumb to me. They had it in K-3, everything was working fine.

May be they are keeping it for k2

indy · 02-17-2016, 02:16 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by xandos

Thanks! Now I can actually start using the theory and do some silky water shots myself with my near-antique K-5!

Try it with the exact same subject. You will probably find that the traditional long exposure look is superior to stacking. Of course this just my opinion. I did this with a GR for a few waterfalls and, hands down, I prefered the looks of the long exposure. I wish I had kept both so I could show a comparison. Maybe someone else has done this with good results and can post samples and explain their technique.

**vcollerp** · 02-17-2016, 02:16 PM

Perhaps a simple case of space.

02-17-2016, 02:16 PM	#450
vcollerp Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Vereeniging South Africa Posts: 208	Perhaps a simple case of space. Attached Images

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
is there a full DA list?? FA out of production?	Albert Siegel	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	9	04-21-2019 12:06 PM
K-1 likely in full production run now...	Fenwoodian	Pentax Full Frame	24	12-11-2015 11:20 AM
Pentax Full-Frame to be Named K-1	PF Staff	Homepage & Official Pentax News	16	11-17-2015 10:13 PM
Adorama Pentax Lens Deals - Full List 12/1	Adam	Pentax Price Watch	3	12-03-2012 12:49 PM
News Full List of Forum Features	Adam	Site Suggestions and Help	6	08-09-2009 10:25 PM

02-17-2016, 12:43 PM - 1 Like	#436
Enrique S Toso Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Mendoza - Argentina Posts: 141	Originally posted by D1N0 1010 with battery Yep, but REALLY all weather...not like "feel like a cheap toy" canikons (yeap, even the D810). Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail.

02-17-2016, 12:45 PM	#437
i5_david Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 332	Originally posted by Enrique S Toso Yep, but REALLY all weather...not like "feel like a cheap toy" canikons (yeap, even the D810). Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail. do you have the link to this test? sounds like hilarious fun... to bridge the time to the final revelation

02-17-2016, 01:06 PM	#438
WillWeaverRVA Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Richmond, VA Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,071	Originally posted by Kenntak I am naive about this, but how much of a difference would ISO 50 make? Some people want the option of being able to take photos while facing an explosion.

02-17-2016, 01:07 PM - 1 Like	#439
Shanti Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Western Denmark Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 927	Originally posted by OJGoreng Local dealer already offers it for pre-order: Foto Booms \| Pentax K1 body \| Productinformatie Price TBA, though. Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet

02-17-2016, 01:19 PM	#440
D1N0 Pentaxian Join Date: May 2012 Location: --- Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,802	Originally posted by Shanti Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet Booms Looman, all these Dutch names must look weird in English.

02-17-2016, 01:20 PM - 1 Like	#441
pathdoc Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2015 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 6,381	Originally posted by Enrique S Toso Theres a video in FStoppers where they try to make the "afghanian test" in a canon and they completly fail. You mean they duplicated what Heie did to his Pentax and they destroyed the Canon DSLR in the process? Oh God, yes, please, the link!!

02-17-2016, 01:31 PM	#442
kooks Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: San José, Costa Rica Photos: Albums Posts: 794	Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1??

02-17-2016, 01:50 PM	#443
rawr Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 11,913	Originally posted by kooks Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1?? No-one but Ricoh engineers can really answer that. Someone should ask them at CP+. It seems dumb to me. They had it in K-3, everything was working fine.

02-17-2016, 01:55 PM - 1 Like	#444
ogl Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Sankt Peterburg Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 8,382	Originally posted by kooks Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1?? Prepare USB3.0 and some new features for K-1II in 1,5 year. ---------- Post added 02-17-2016 at 01:56 PM ---------- Originally posted by kooks Dont know if this is already asked ( if it is please forgive me ).. but.. Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1?? Honestly - I used USB with my Pentax cameras several times from 2005. It seems to me 3-4 times.

02-17-2016, 02:00 PM - 1 Like	#445
beachgardener Site Supporter Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Australia Photos: Gallery Posts: 3,842	Originally posted by kooks Does anyone knows a possible technical reason why going from USB 3.0 to USB 2.0 with the K1?? maybe they think wireless tethering is the go, and beyond that who uses the usb port? however I agree, if a usb port is included it should be usb3.

02-17-2016, 02:03 PM	#446
RonHendriks1966 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 9,675	Originally posted by Shanti Have pre-ordered from Foto Looman...no price yet Ah you are one of the pre-orders. I was in the store on februari 6th. Nice people, visits them not that often since I live in The South of The Netherlands.

02-17-2016, 02:03 PM	#447
Zygonyx Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Ile de France Posts: 4,033	Originally posted by beachgardener maybe they think wireless tethering is the go, and beyond that who uses the usb port? Yes, i think they hesitated to just throw it away like Apple, but they only downscaled it this time.

02-17-2016, 02:04 PM	#448
zmohie Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: egypt Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 435	Originally posted by rawr No-one but Ricoh engineers can really answer that. Someone should ask them at CP+. It seems dumb to me. They had it in K-3, everything was working fine. May be they are keeping it for k2

02-17-2016, 02:16 PM - 1 Like	#449
indy Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Indiana Photos: Gallery Posts: 274	Originally posted by xandos Thanks! Now I can actually start using the theory and do some silky water shots myself with my near-antique K-5! Try it with the exact same subject. You will probably find that the traditional long exposure look is superior to stacking. Of course this just my opinion. I did this with a GR for a few waterfalls and, hands down, I prefered the looks of the long exposure. I wish I had kept both so I could show a comparison. Maybe someone else has done this with good results and can post samples and explain their technique.