Originally posted by CarlH My point was here in the UK our government takes a good cut from the sale of anything, to the point that I personally rarely buy new camera equipment.
It's a fair point, however...
As I'm sure you know, VAT in the UK goes into the same pot as all other taxes - these days, there is no differentiation between income tax, National Insurance, VAT, etc. It all goes into one big pot, and is then applied to the costs of running the country and providing all of our publicly-funded services (so, the money you and I pay in road fund tax doesn't necessarily get spent on our roads). If our government didn't impose VAT, that would result in a huge deficit of funds for public spending, and they'd have to tax something else more heavily to make up that deficit. The US has equally brutal taxation in other ways (perhaps on a state by state basis - I'm not entirely sure)... one example being property taxes, which - as I recall hearing about from my teams in the US during my banking and broking days - are (or were) considerably worse than ours in the UK. My point here is that, one way or another, governments - and countries - need money to function - and while the sources may vary proportionally, the average impact on an individual is probably not wildly different...
All of that said, you make a good point about buying used rather than new. It makes very good sense if you're happy to do it. I should do it more often, frankly.