Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-19-2016, 03:00 AM   #1
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,326
K-1 pre-production full res JPGs versus D810 ISO 12800, ISO 51200

Full Res ISO 12800 (no noise reduction) :
K-1 http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP1017.JPG
D810 http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/d810/DSC_0145.JPG

A little scary ISO 51200 (watch for Details in the open Prismdome):
K-1 http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP1019.JPG
D810 http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/d810/DSC_0147.JPG

Full Res K-1 outside:
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP0614.JPG
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP0481.JPG
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP0540.JPG
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP0593.JPG
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP0491.JPG

Whatever sick pixelpeepers might say, this should be good enough for anyone who can't afford a larger sensor pro camera like the Pentax 645z. Whiners fell free.

Mod edit: these pre-production photos (v0.38) that may not be representative of the image quality of the production K-1


Last edited by beholder3; 03-21-2016 at 08:02 AM.
03-19-2016, 03:10 AM - 1 Like   #2
Site Supporter
kenspo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Oslo
Posts: 1,948
As i have said for a long time. It will be a new world for me now. Finally i can compete with the same awesome tools as the others
03-19-2016, 03:23 AM - 1 Like   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Feb 2015
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,459
QuoteOriginally posted by kenspo Quote
As i have said for a long time. It will be a new world for me now. Finally i can compete with the same awesome tools as the others
Yep , as we can see from the full resolution photographs, you've made the right decision to stay with Ricoh.
03-19-2016, 03:27 AM   #4
ogl
Pentaxian
ogl's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Siberia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,216
K-1 is much better, but blurred. Nikon is sharp.

03-19-2016, 03:29 AM   #5
Senior Member
Bromberger's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 122
Looks good.

Weird though: The 810 has a lot of colour noise, while the K1 has none. And colour noise can be corrected quite easily. It's almost as someone ran colour noise reduction over only one of the two pictures.

Also, what's with the large horizontal lines (over the bottles, or the yellow area around the clock) in the 51k-iso-picture of the K1? It looks almost as if the scene was lit through window blinds.

Not trying to bash the K1, i'm confident it's gonna be an awesome camera.

---------- Post added 03-19-16 at 12:30 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by ogl Quote
K-1 is much better, but blurred. Nikon is sharp.
No, the focus is just somewhere else in the picture, take another look.
03-19-2016, 03:34 AM   #6
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Newcastle
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,529
K1 shot looks better but there is some horizontal banding that bothers me ????
03-19-2016, 03:38 AM   #7
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 819
It's probably because of the different perspectives (K-1 is a little closer and more straight on), but the K-1 shots appear to have shallower DOF, making it impossible to judge relative sharpness for the objects in the background.

The D810 shots show a lot more color noise than the K-1, which is surprising considering they're supposed to have a similar if not the same sensor. Some kind of hidden NR on the K-1?

Last edited by Cannikin; 03-19-2016 at 03:52 AM.
03-19-2016, 03:39 AM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 9,230
I wouldn't be too worried about banding seen in a pre-production camera.

03-19-2016, 03:41 AM   #9
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Newcastle
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,529
the full res shot outside of the shed, track and snow is awesome. DR and sharpness great across the whole frame. Very good.
03-19-2016, 03:49 AM   #10
Senior Member
gorme's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Galway - Ireland
Posts: 212
QuoteOriginally posted by Wild Mark Quote
K1 shot looks better but there is some horizontal banding that bothers me ????
Given the shutter speed, I suspect flickering
03-19-2016, 03:53 AM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 482
Compared to the D810, which seems to have been a sort of reference standard till now, the K-1 shows significantly lower chroma noise at high ISO. It looks like a new standard of performance in high ISO Full Frame photography is now possible.

Very good job done, Pentax - heartiest congratulations!
03-19-2016, 03:56 AM   #12
Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,623
The detail in the deconstructed Minolta is very well resolved in the K-1 images. From the D810 it's total mush.
The angle, and angle of view are quite different so real comparisons are impossible though. Are they SOOC jpegs, or RAW files processed similarly? If the former, at least some of the differences could be due to the in-camera processing.
03-19-2016, 04:30 AM   #13
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,759
IIRC from the K-1 website, they did things to the stuff that hangs off the back of the sensor for better NR. It would appear that this has had pleasant results.

On another note, who else thinks there is something dreadfully grim and metaphorical about flagship-level Pentax and Nikon cameras going head to head by photographing a dead Minolta, especially with a Sony product also present in the frame...
03-19-2016, 04:50 AM   #14
Pentaxian
Mistral75's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 2,954
Don't conclude too much from these pictures, in particular from their flaws.
QuoteQuote:
Firmware: PENTAX K-1 Ver. 0.38
03-19-2016, 04:58 AM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden, Umea
Posts: 870
Comparing a7rmk2 vs pentax k-1 shows a pretty ugly side of the sony

Iso 3200
Sony A7Rmk2
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/a7rmk2/DSC01169.JPG
vs
Pentax K-1
http://www.cyberphoto.se/bildexempel/k1/IMGP1015.JPG
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
algorithm, colour, d810, files, fud, iso, k-1, k1, nikon, noise, nr, op, opinion, pentax news, pentax rumors, res
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K-30. ISO 400...12800. Mr. A.S. Pentax K-30 & K-50 9 08-11-2012 06:01 AM
Misc The fun of shooting at ISO 51200 (K-5)... igor Post Your Photos! 10 07-14-2011 01:43 PM
K-5, DNG/RAW ISO Case Study (6400-51200)... JohnBee Pentax K-5 47 10-29-2010 09:14 PM
K-5 Vs K-7 ISO 6400 & 12800 eigelb Pentax News and Rumors 7 09-28-2010 03:19 AM
Another ISO 12800 sample from D7000, good news for K-5? leeak Pentax News and Rumors 26 09-18-2010 03:57 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top