Originally posted by Imp K-s2 hasn't succeeded the K-50? I thought the K-_0 line was over, and the K-s_ is the new consumer body.
For a year now I've been commenting {some might even say "complaining"} about Pentax's management of their lower level K-mount cameras. They've been selling K-50, K-S1, and K-S2 all in parallel, with no clear indication of what market they see for each one. When my Canon Rebel unexpectedly died just about a year ago, and I decided to go with a K-mount, I ended up getting a K-30 because of price, because at a time when our cash was quite tight, I didn't see any great benefit to me of paying more than twice as much to get a K-Sx. {incidentally, the upper level isn't much better, since they seem to be selling the K-3 and K-3ii in parallel}. My belief is that their line is bloated - just too many models for the average user to evaluate - and they need to "rationalize" things before they introduce any new models.