Originally posted by Zygonyx Only for storage....
I see people saying that the new high iso will be useless and is just sales oriented spec, but I have a serious question;
doesn't higher iso spec usually indicate at least the possibility of cleaner images at the other more usable iso's ? And, will real tested base iso be lower than the rated 100? I didn't see any mention of expanded iso, like some older models had.
All I can say is that if this thing can give near K5IIs level noise free images at pixel peep level with 24mp, then I wouldn't care if it was shaped like a midevil torture device, or a K-01, and covered in poison ivey. Lol! Heck, it would be a no brainer option for long tele work over the K-1, I'd carry one as a small second body, instead of a super long tele, and it would take less room in the bag next to the K-1.
Even if there really is a K3.3 coming, the KP could still make more sense for people who might want a high res, compact apsc second body to go with their K-1.
Eric