Trying to catch up,...
I did note, the DNG raws are available in this test -
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-kp/pentax-kpA7.HTM Originally posted by ChrisJowett More expensive than an A7S? I hope not. Probably more expensive than an A7, but if it's $3k+ for a body i won't be happy.
Well, yeah, but cost wasn't the point of that comment.
(Locally, the A7s 'body only', is cheaper then a K-1, and the A7s2 is more expensive)
Looking at the samples on the Imaging Resources review, IFF the KP had a recordable output (AFAIK we still have no data on the Slimport output) the amount of noise in the images is lower then the A7s at ISO's from 3200 to 52000, when the A7s is Not using sLog2.
I'd say, IFF Pentax gets there arse in to gear with quality video firmware, this sensor has the capability of showing up some very expensive competitors for HD production.
The potential is there, they just need the will and guidance to take advantage of it.
If they want to venture in to s32 format 'cinema' cameras and 4K output - say, this sensor in a body that looks like Sony's VG series and uses the rumoured short K-mount - The noise characteristics of the sensor and processing, would have owners of Red Epics worried.
---------- Post added 16-02-17 at 02:59 PM ----------
Originally posted by RMabo HDMI Video out is in the SlimPort, you just need a SlimPort to HDMI adapter. The signal is there! A traditional HDMI port was found to be too large so therefore this solution instead.
Hope so.
Iff it outputs at the same frame rate that the camera is set up to record at (and not swap to something completely unusable with a different frame rate when you hit record - looking at you Pentax K-3,..) Iff the output is at 24, or 25, or 30 frames, and Iff we can select higher then 3200ISO, then you won't want to get between me and the salesperson.
Especially given the sample images sharpness and apparent retained dynamic range at higher ISO's.
---------- Post added 16-02-17 at 03:04 PM ----------
Originally posted by newmikey Just to make sure, I ran the available High-res samples through NeatImage8, set to highest quality and I find ISO12800 delivers top results, ISO25600 is still very usable . . . . -> I'll post some crops of those files below:
They look great, thanks for doing that - it tells us on the video side how much effect DaVinci Resolve's noise correction would have on the same images if recorded in an appropriate file format.
Last edited by PiDicus Rex; 02-15-2017 at 09:06 PM.