Originally posted by pres589 Norm, do you like the 28-105 on crop more than the 18-135? Not considering the lack of "wide" on the wide end of the 28-105 on crop, thinking about everything else.
.
Now that's a tough one. I would take the 18-135 off to use the 28-105 for an appropriate landscape image. But landscape is only part of what I do with the 18-135. But, it's a better lens in it's focal range. Usually not enough to change lenses for, unless I'm seeing a large print quality scene. It pretty much lives on the K-1.
But in our comparison tests, on the K-1 shot at 50mm and the K-5 shot a 35, the images were indistinguishable at 2650x1600. It has the kind of spacial characteristics you expect from an FA ltd. Lots of 3D pop even on a landscape.
The 18-135 is a better walk around snapshot, pseudo macro, do everything lens. I shoot it way too often at 20mm or 135mm to dream i could get away with the 28-105 on the K-3. Plus where the 18-135 is stellar at 24mm, the 28-105 doesn't even go there.
Last edited by normhead; 07-28-2017 at 11:02 AM.