Originally posted by lithedreamer

Guess you better change my signature. The FA 31, 43, 77, DFA 100, DFA 28-105 are all small lenses. I have one big lens for my K-1. It's great, but I do want small, too.
Are you implying that you might feel the benefit of one or two pounds advantage of the
weight quality of the lens does have way much more impact on your every day photography fun than changing the
resolution quality of the lens from 2456 LP/PH to 2581 LP/PH which you are the only person to ever recognize but all the consumers of your images / your friends and family never?
Heresy! Sicko basement dwelling pixelpeepers: build up a pyre!
And don't start to mention
size quality... Comfortably putting a good size quality lens in your jacket pocket versus having to drag around a big extra bag for a poorly designed lens with inferior size quality... Who want's to enjoy photography?
Don't we all want the early 1 pound cellphones back, which clearly had a better audio quality? A pro caller only uses 1 pound cellphones!