I've been a Pentaxian since the H1A and screw mounted lenses. They have made a good product and were innovative.....But as a older person with most of my days behind me I weighed the issues with Pentax after waiting a few years too long for the K3 update.
First was the continuing change in ownership. Then, In the 2000 decade they produced mostly cameras for entry level people with things like the LED's that lit the body & shutter release and the Marc Newsome Mirrorless (Which I still have and converted to IR). The long and late entry to the full frame market with virtually no glass to support it.
I also feel they could have done better with their DA* lenses and faulty AF motors
( In 1991 when BMW introduced the power top on their 3 series, it was a dud and they would usually convert it back to manual free of charge They did a complete redesign for the 92). Also without elaborating, the
Aperture Block issues on a few different models . Both of these issues could be repaired ,at owners expense, with the same defective part. I had a DA* focusing motor fail twice. Why did it take outside engineers / tinkerers to come up with the conversion back to screw mount, that is a tad slower but reliable? This could have been offered by Pentax, if they cared about their customers.
I made the decision to move on, and sold almost all my Pentax gear, and was surprised to find even better image quality with the mirrorless system I adopted. In digital photography, newer is usually better.
I do believe the K3 replacement will be the hot camera of 2019 -20 -or 21 for those who choose to wait, just as the ist*D was much better than the Nikon D100 when they were in direct competition. If I was in my 30's or 40's, I too would probably have held out for the next big thing.
Enjoy the speculation, but don't lose the realization that the camera is only part of the photographic experience. I think I did my best work with my K 10D, probably because my knees were in better shape.
Photobobhunt
-Out