Originally posted by Mark Ransom I'm one of those people on the other site.
There's really nothing wrong with the partnership, it's the pricing policy difference that galls. Evidently both lenses have the same list price, but Tokina is much more free with their discounts. As a practical matter, it means you're better off getting another camera than a Pentax if you want the lens.
The pricing policy ties nicely into your other comment. Pentax is keeping a tight grip to maintain their list prices, but usually that's done to keep the margins healthy for B&M stores. But Pentax doesn't have any.
Hm, this is getting interesting now, since the price of the Tokina is really as close as it can get and some preventive complains turned out to be premature the shere fact that there is a comparable product which might be at a certain point cheaper than the original seemt to be the target of dissatisfaction? Poor Ricoh, they really can not do it right ;-)
But being at that, an original product guarantees some additional things a third party may or may not fulfil. There will always be some gambling with reversely engineered mounts and communication protocols. Wasn't there something with the famous Sigma Art and some comeras not focussing correctly? Who do you approach in such cases? Do you send the camera and lens to Sigma? Nikon will probably just refuse to do anything about this fact...
And which camera model would give you the equivalent of a K1(II) with 36 Mpix and image stabilisation with this lens and offering full support for it? I'm speaking of real world use now, not polemics.