Originally posted by Rondec They just need to get some more DFA * lenses out there and yes, they can easily be mounted on an APS-C camera like the K3 II sequel.
I don't understand the comment. The DFA are FF, no? So it means they are bigger & more expensive. One of the advantages of apsc is overall smaller size & cheaper. I know i can, but why would i put a bigger & more expensive FF lens on my k3 (or sequel)?
But i agree, they need to get some more dfa lenses out there. Right now, i still feel pentax being a mixed bag. Apsc body development being a bit behing because of the focus on FF & FF lenses being a bit behind because of resources (?..)
Not sure about this, feels like betting on two horses.
---------- Post added 11-16-18 at 12:30 PM ----------
Originally posted by Rondec By all accounts, Nikon's Z cameras aren't doing well. Not sure why a Pentax mirrorless camera would do any better.
Bit early to say nikon Z is not doing well imo.
When looking at fuji. I think they are doing well, not so much because they go mirrorless, but more because of the package they deliver. Small capable attractive bodies & suited lenses.. Mirrorless does allow them partially to go there. So i do agree on the last part.. but for a different reason.