Originally posted by Snakeisthestuff If they could easily negate the jelly effect like this it wouldnt be there in the first place.
Even though its possible they use a technical improved SR I believe this camera is more like a small upgrade with available ressources than introducing such a major novelty.
They could eliminate the jelly effect (that's exactly what happens when SR mechanically stabilizes the sensor). But for the superresolution stacking using SR data to get the subpixel offsets of the scan lines, jelly is actually good and improves the ability of the camera to increase the resolution in the stack.
These days, there are no "major novelties" in any new camera. Everything has been done before. There's just a stream of incremental improvements in resolution, dynamic range, high-ISO IQ, frames per second, video resolution & bit rate, AF, etc. These days, all digital cameras have good performance with some (usually the more expensive ones) having incrementally better performance on one dimension or another.
For some photographers and some photographic situations, dynamic PS of the K-1ii will be big deal in terms of getting much higher resolution images without the bulk, hassle, and set-up delays of a tripod and regular PS.
And for a larger subset of photographers and photographic situations, the K-1ii's better IQ at high ISO will be big deal in terms of getting much better pictures (less noise, less blur, deeper DoF) under dimmer-than-daylight conditions. (They may get to ditch both the tripod and the flash.)
It's up to each photographer to decide what K-1ii can do for them.