Originally posted by Mistral75 In addition to
Kunzite's comment, I would add that the K bayonet throat is most probably not wide enough to accommodate a 50mm f/1 lens.
Sent from my Dell Latitude using Firefox.
That is true. That rear element with the cutout for the contacts is a unique thing. Canon did for certain take advantage of that wider bayonet mount (a thing I see that's very limiting to Nikon) with that particular lens. Instant collectible. That's what I was rooting for.
And yes, that lens is also from the film era. That's why I was toying with the idea of a modern version. Also, the AF system would have to be groundbreaking (including face recognition and particularly eye recognition) and nail perfect focus on eyes each and every time at that shallow of a depth of field .
1.4 will be enough if it's usable from wide open, which I'm sure it will be. I have the FA and it's best at f/4. Otherwise it works good on film, b&w and for cheesy soft portraits. I guess that's a look pixel peepers have nightmares over.
Even a 1.2 would've been stretching things too far. Also matching a price tag of 1300 USD, too. I wonder if this new lens will be in the sub 1k or even sub 800 category. Any info on that?
Talking about lenses available now, I wonder if anyone has had a chance to play with those hugely expensive (for a triplet design and not very wide aperture, all manual) from the reborn Meyer-Optik Görlitz. Their appeal must be their projection and rendering.
Gesendet von meinem Mi A1 mit Tapatalk