Originally posted by Larrymc Just a quick perusal of the cover page and going no deeper you can easily see where their opinions come from........advertisers!! They are going to be biased toward their paid advertisers.
Larry
It’s possible...but they give you the data and describe their methodology. All of the cameras there are their top performers for this test, so they’re all good, and the differences are really minor. If the question is, “which camera will reproduce colors as accurately as possible?” Then any of these top performers would get you there.
---------- Post added 06-26-2018 at 06:16 AM ----------
Originally posted by MatKus First of all, as already mentioned, I have no idea what they are measuring if by method they are sure to fail in some way, when you have colors outside sRGB.
2nd, i don't know who taught them math, but it looks like 9 cameras are better, than K1, so K1 is 6th?
And most important of all - protography is about how it looks, not how it calculates. For me, many colors on sample images looks much more different, than numbers shows, and sometimes i barely see any difference when number show its big. So i don't think that's important at all.
Agreed. I’m not sure how they’re calculating difference. What’s funny is that this is akin to high end audio, where accurate reproduction is the objective. But the truth is that everyone manipulates the result in Lightroom, so it’s like having the most accurate reproduction, and then tossing a bunch of filters on top and messing with the EQ. :-)