Originally posted by Mark Ransom I admit it was pure speculation, which is why my first two words were "I think".
As far as negative perceptions, which is more negative - that Pentax was being overly conservative, or that they are totally clueless when it comes to projecting demand? In any case it's a problem that is easily rectified, and I do consider it a positive sign overall. I notice you didn't take exception to that part of my statement.
I think demand is just really high. Pentax (like all brands) does runs of lenses to cover demand for the next year or two and then will shut that line down and work on other lenses. There would be no point to their making just twenty-five or fifty lenses. They will keep building DFA *50 lenses until they have a sizeable store of them and then move on.
I would just read this statement as a positive one (Pentaxians are really interested in high end gear and are willing to pay for it), rather than a negative one (Pentax is run by idiots who are clueless at projecting demand). If demand is high, it will give more encouragement to get the other DFA * primes out the door.