Originally posted by clackers Yep, if they won't make lenses for Fuji because it's uneconomical (quote from their CEO: "I really wish we could make a lens for the X mount system but right now, just because our resources are limited, we don’t have such a plan") they certainly won't for Pentax!
They're such a small company - 100 million yen capitalization - one business mistake and the family business is up in smoke!
You’ll find that a huge number of Japanese companies state their capitalization at exactly 100,000,000 yen. One yen more and they’ll trigger a higher rate of tax on a portion of their income. So Sigma is way bigger than that 1m dollar figure would indicate.
They can afford to make loss making products and live to tell the tale. Pretty much their whole camera and sensor business is testament to that. But I don’t think they have much sentimental attachment to Pentax, so there’s no reason to persist with loss making products in K-mount.
However, I don’t see why this attracting so much attention at this moment. It has been pretty obvious what is happening for years now. Pentax was never the best choice of mount if you wanted to use Sigma anyway.
Despite all the predictions that Pentax is dying, K-mount is the only DSLR mount that looks fully alive. SA mount is officially finished. A-mount was effectively done some time ago. Nikon and Canon DSLR are being superseded by mirrorless mounts targeting the same users and price points. I think you’d have to be naive to think they’ll keep making DSLRs any longer than they have to.
K-mount on the other hand has a future roadmap and public plans for at least one new high end camera. They’ve made statements about their commitment to DSLRs. The company itself is not in financial difficulty.