Originally posted by revelstoked Agreed.. I really wanted to like it, even actually tracked one down in store (no mean feat here in Western Canada!) But I just couldn't get behind the ergonomics. If it had felt better I probably would have justified the lacking video and dial quirks... Although, I would have probably sobered to it later. It sure does look nice though...
So you "just couldn't get behind the ergonomics"??? Frankly, that is a really lame excuse. That is
your problem; once you put the largest {
plastic} grip on a KP, it has the ergonomics of a K-50. That is like my saying "I don't like black cameras" ..... I truly don't, but they take better pictures than a broken camera does. Incidentally, the "quirky dials" on the KP come from the K-1, so there is every reason to expect future Pentax cameras to have them also; once I got used to them, they allow me to change all three sides of the 'exposure triangle' without lowering the camera from my eye. My Grandmother, who was born a Hungarian peasant and died 85 years later the Mother-in-Law of an American Engineer, would sit down to dinner sometimes, and after looking at the food her daughter had prepared would shrug and say "If that is all there is" and clean her plate.
My wife and I use that "If that is all there is" expression a lot. I wish my K-30 had a much smaller 'handle' - it gets in the way when I try to use it the way I was taught to use a camera sixty years ago - but when my Canon Rebel completely died four years ago, that is what there was. Even today you could purchase a K-3 at eBay; I counted up to 20, then quit. You have absolutely no idea what the next Pentax camera will be like - at one point a Pentax person demurred from showing a silhouette because it might show something ,.... maybe that was an excuse, but maybe they have gone so far from the K-7 body that you can't "get behind the ergonomics" of this one also.