Originally posted by Sandy Hancock I think there is definitely space for three APS-C models:
Entry level - K-70 and its successor
Compact travel/street enthusiast option - KP
Prosumer safari/sports option - K-new
The question is whether there is room for a second tier of full frame: 24MP sports, or (dare I say it?) mirrorless....
Personally I don't find the KP to be noticeably smaller in use than my K-70. Hold them both with even an FA77 mounted and I suspect you'd realize the same.
BUT...
The KP is certainly more "cluttered", adding more dials and buttons to a only-so-slightly smaller physical form. I can almost use the K-70 blindfolded. It's a familiar layout with enough spacing between all the controls that there is rarely any confusion about which one you're manipulating. Now if you're a landscape photographer or studio shooter who takes their time to set up a shot it's no big deal. You can slow down enough to pay attention to what you're doing. Run and gun or quickly changing conditions my K70 will win out every single time, much quicker to lift, set, focus, and shoot. You can't imagine how many times I've set up my KP for a for a peculiar lighting condition and then rather than pressing the awkwardly positioned back-button focus press the green button instead.
Yes, the KP has some features that the K70 does not and yes I've made use of them, DoF bracketing being one. Depending on the kind of photos you enjoy taking you might prefer the more compact (i call it cluttered) controls layout and quick set options, and if it is the only camera you have you eventually get used to it all anyway. It's still not as comfortable to hold as a K70 and moving between different bodies you notice it.
Going forward the K70 definitely serves a purpose. It's an extremely capable entry to even prosumer grade APS-c, bang for buck one of the truly great camera values in the marketplace IMHO. No one could tell the difference between two images taken at the same time on both a KP and K70. Photo quality is identical, with a lens mounted the size is close to the same, even the body alone in reality, and I don't feel any difference in weight.
Once the new Pentax drops what purpose does a KP fill? It's really not much smaller than the already compact K70. The grips are far too shallow, all three of them. If I didn't have a Spyder handstrap on mine I'd always be concerned with dropping it especially in a crowd.
It doesn't offer faster focusing or IMO even more usable high-ISO shots which was initially one of the big draws. I can't think of any time where my KP saved me from missing a shot that my K70 would have been incapable of. Amazing photos are captured by both and TBH there have been times where the KP was a better choice for a given situation, but it's not worth the overall trade-off in comfort and security. Heck even installing the hand strap with the holster pin I keep on my cameras still have access to the battery door was a challenge. I couldn't use the spare I already had as it was always going to block the door. No way around it. I had to buy the the smaller "mirrorless" pin and even that was tricky. And guess what? It still put a small scratch near the lens mount in order to use it.
IMO the KP is a nice camera and if it is the only one you will own and you want every conceivable situation covered then it is one really good choice. More customization options, higher ISO's (?), improved menu which really needs to make it's way to a K-70 II... but all that will be covered with a new APS-c flagship. Why would the KP stick around? Just oh-so-slightly smaller camera body that isn't as secure in the hand and less balanced with a larger lens? I don't see a place for a KPII in the future. If anything it may morph into some test of a mirrorless if they'll just fix the obvious.
All just my opinions of course.
But I do see a future for a K-70-ish one.
Last edited by gatorguy; 10-06-2019 at 07:18 AM.