Originally posted by reh321 This thread is theoretically about timing of the new camera.
It is interesting how every Thread eventually turns to the LCD.
I think it's interesting how some people are so very certain that this camera will have a flip/articulating screen despite almost all evidence provided as of yet to the contrary. I can relate that to something else but then it'll get political and that's a big no-no. Even so, it's pointless even trying to discuss it because we don't know
anything, literally nothing, about this camera except for what it looks like as of the last showing and that it will be the APS-C flagship. That's it. Everything else is
unknown.
So everyone who is whining and crying about it not having a flippy screen (yes, you people are whining and crying about it [not meant at you reh]) are doing so needlessly. They're yelling into a void because - face it - you won't change the overall outcome, inclusion or exclusion, of the feature. If they're completely trashing the mere thought of buying the new camera for the sole reason that it might not have their prefered mechanism for screen movement, oh well. I'm of the opinion that that is just a feature that's easily picked out as a scape goat for them to blame their not wanting the camera on. I personally don't care one bit what the screen does. I've used the K-70 and I moved to the K-3II. Sure, the lack of a flippy screen has been inconvenient at times but in no way does it make the K-70 more of a "premier" camera over the K-3II. And it only forces me to try to be a bit more creative.
Anyway, if they want to get the new camera and are so sure that it is still a flip screen, I'd oblige them to try to "flip" the screen using the "indentation" and see what happens. But they can't come running to me or Ricoh when their screen breaks and they're left with a no-screen camera instead.