Originally posted by Kunzite
And all of them are shooting f/2.8 zooms and RAW only?
Your posts sound very much like kettle logic, random complaints.
In all honesty: I am starting to get anoyed by you turning my sentences to something I never said.
Not all of them do, of course not. Statistically speaking however those f2.8 lenses are those which are most selled to professionell photographers, at least for both Nikon and Canon, which already is the biggest part of the market. Both Nikon and Canon told this multiple times.
Those are the lenses almost (!) every photo studio owns and are seen on most of weddings and such.
Of course there are other professionalls, of course there are other ways of satisfying the needs.
There is a reason Pentax is at only 3% market share, and the reason is they placed themselves bad on the market at sime point and not some kind of conspiracy. Them loosing designed labority tests over and over is one of them, no matter how far this is off from real world usage. If the jpg quality is 0.0001% worse than the competators, it is ranked behind it in the "best camera of xxxx for yyyy". The actual usage quality of a camera (one of Pentaxs strengths) is a way less important selling factor than winning on versus.com, dpreview, youtube channel xy.
In our time, sythetic benchmarks rule sells when it comes to technology.
The fact that other companies like Sigma and tamron dropped the k mount support is another clear sine, that others being in the same market do not trust the market position to change for the better, at least not by far.